|
How do you know when you're through the looking glass? A fairly good indication
is when the price of gold, which normally moves up in response to monetary
easing, instead plummets in reaction to one of the largest rate cuts in Fed
history. Apparently, yesterday's 6% drop in gold resulted from the "hawkishness" shown
by the Fed in only cutting rates by 75 basis points, rather than the 100 points
that many had expected. It is a testament to how low the bar has been set that
the Fed can slash rates in the face of a collapsing dollar and soaring commodity
prices and still be viewed as hawkish on inflation. Is it just me, or is Ben
Bernanke morphing into the Mad Hatter?
Despite the mildly tough language in its statement, it should be clear to
all that the Fed sees inflation as the only politically acceptable "solution" to
the problems it created. The conclusion that a 75 point cut shows concern about
inflation is half right. The Fed is concerned, but only to the extent that
the markets stay focused on bogus CPI numbers and fail to notice severe price
increases throughout the economy. The fact is that inflation will be with us
for some time, and the knee jerk drop in gold is yet another excellent buying
opportunity.
As the credit and financial crisis spirals out of control, and the Fed moved
$30 billion of garbage Bear Stearns debt onto the public balance sheet, the
proposals coming from other market leaders are taking similarly phantasmagorical
turns. Steve Forbes, in an interview on CNBC earlier in the week, proposed
that the government suspend "mark-to-market" rules for one year so that holders
of unsellable mortgage-backed securities no longer have to recognize losses.
Remember, the dominos began to fall precisely when two Bear Stearns hedge funds
were forced to actually sell assets they had failed to properly mark-to-market.
Were the government to actually follow this advice it would destroy what little
confidence remains in our financial system. However, Mr. Forbes believes that
the markets can be spared unnecessary pain if participants can simply pretend
that their holdings are worth par value. This amounts to a plea for accounting
by mutually beneficial mass delusion.
Later in the week, investors were cheered by the Government's decision to
slash the surplus capital requirement of already overextended Fannie Mae and
Freddie Mac by 33%, and by Wall Street's success in convincing investors to
dump $17.9 billion into the record IPO of Visa...which may qualify as the largest
sucker bet in history. But the most bizarre idea was introduced on the pages
of the Wall Street Journal when veteran opinion page writer Holman Jenkins
Jr. recommended that the government buy and "bulldoze" foreclosed homes in
order to prop up the values of those that remain standing. I'll deal with these
ideas in sequence.
After pushing through earlier proposals that allow and encourage Fannie and
Freddie to buy larger loans, the reduction of capital requirements now pushes
the government sponsored lenders farther out on a leveraged limb. By allowing
the accumulation of even more taxpayer guaranteed debt, the moves will merely
delay and exacerbate the housing problems and will increase the size of losses
when these two government sponsored enterprises ultimately fail. In the meantime,
by taking on more risk, the appeal of existing Fannie and Freddie insured debt
will erode further, driving up mortgage costs, and creating additional losses
for leveraged owners of these securities.
In the early stages of the biggest credit crunch in U.S. history, buying shares
in Visa, a company that derives its revenues based on transaction fees from
credit card purchases, qualifies as a particularly ill- timed investment. Perhaps
buyers of these shares didn't get the memo, but the days of Americans using
credit cards to buy products they cannot afford are about to come to an end.
For all its flaws, Wall Street does possess an extraordinary ability to apply
lipstick on any pig. For the formerly private owners of Visa, this is perhaps
one the best exit strategies ever engineered, on par with the Hail Mary orchestrated
by Blackstone last year (shares of Blackstone are now trading for half their
IPO price).
Finally, in response to Mr. Jenkins' proposals, there is no question that
we built far too many homes during the housing bubble. However, destroying
them now will merely compound our losses. The one benefit we have from excess
construction is an ample supply of what will soon be highly affordable homes.
At the moment foreclosed houses are only unwanted because their prices are
still too high. Once prices drop sufficiently there will be plenty of demand.
However, destroying existing homes reduces their value to zero (actually less
due to demolition costs) and only exacerbates the losses to creditors and society.
Mr. Jenkins' thinking is formed by the same perverse logic that led the Roosevelt
Administration to destroy farm animals and crops during the 1930's because
he wanted to prop up food prices. As I wrote in my book "Crash Proof", we must
certainly be on the eve of our financial destruction, as we are clearly a nation
gone completely mad.
For a more in depth analysis of our financial problems and the inherent dangers
they pose for the U.S. economy and U.S. dollar denominated investments, read
my new book "Crash Proof: How to Profit from the Coming Economic Collapse." Click here to
order a copy today.
More importantly, don't wait for reality to set in. Protect your wealth and
preserve your purchasing power before it's too late. Discover the best way
to buy gold at www.goldyoucanfold.com,
download my free research report on the powerful case for investing in foreign
equities available at www.researchreportone.com,
and subscribe to my free, on-line investment newsletter at http://www.europac.net/newsletter/newsletter.asp.
|