|
The South African government will give state-owned power utility, Eskom, R80
billion in funding it was announced in the annual budget on 20th February to
help it boost electricity generation. Since then it is clear that Eskom will
be able to access the needed total funding of well over R300 billion [$37.5
billion] to expand capacity. Since then Eskom has confirmed that it needs to
see South Africans cut power demand by 10% for the next few years. At the moment
the main city of South Africa is suffering power outages every second day for
between 1 and 3 hours at a time. It has recommended too that expansion plans
for the mines, smelters in the country, housing projects and new ventures be
curtailed until Eskom can guarantee the needed electricity to operate them.
It expects power cuts to continue until at least 2013. So that one, on the
outside, can gain some perspective of the problem and how it will be handled
in the future, it would be good to see just how such a SNAFU could have happened.
More than 10 years ago there was excess power capacity in Eskom's hands, but
it foresaw that this would be taken up and growth would be accommodated easily,
but there would be a requirement for one power station a year thereafter. But
the company falls under the Department of Minerals and Energy. It requested
funding, so we are told, but was refused it on the basis that Eskom had too
much capacity and too many well paid engineers. So the excess power capacity
was mothballed expansion was halted. Even maintenance was cut to the minimum.
Well, as we know from the man who fell off the 50 story building said as he
passed the 12th floor, "So far, so good", all was not well!
The
one day late in 2007 power was cut and the story came out much to the embarrassment
of all in government and all in Eskom [Just as the top echelons were awarding
themselves shares and incredible bonuses and salary increases.] The government
tried to put a good spin on it, and said the crisis could be contained, by
Eskom recently announcing that it would have to change its tune, it was far
worse than they thought.
Then one saw the Minister of Finance pleading that Electricity prices had
to go up 53% or 100% next year. With the damage scheduled to go on until 2013
and the country being taken off the good investment list, R30 billion worth
of government stock has been sold sucking out the [carry trade investments]
'hot money' that has enjoyed a strengthening Rand and very high interest rates
of over 13%. The Rand then fell from R6.8 :$1 to R8.2:$1 in a matter of weeks.
Given that South Africa continues to have a high trade deficit that is unlikely
to slow, the Governor of the Reserve Bank is in a muck sweat. He has warned
South Africans to tighten their belts. He had to weigh up the negatives of
imposing Exchange Controls on this departing money with the future needs for
foreign capital against each other. The money then flooded out.
Just below 10,000 jobs were going to be cut in the mining industry and a lot
more outside it [up to 80,000?] if Eskom didn't play it right, so Eskom decided
that household supply was more important than mining supply,until it was realized
in the mining industry, in particular the gold sector would definitely have
to shed jobs if this was done. The deep gold mines need half their power to
light and cool the mines to make work conditions bearable or they would have
to close shafts for safety reasons if they only got 90%.
Mining executives have pointed out that cuts in electrical power have a non-linear
effect on gold mines. The typical deep level gold mine allocates roughly 50%
of its electrical feed to refrigeration, ventilation and pumping. These facilities
need to run at 100% before men can be put down the shafts, meaning that a 10%
cut in overall electrical feed to a mine would in fact translate into a 20%
cut in the balance of the mine's power usage. It was not so bad in the coal
mining industry and in Platinum mining where the mines are relatively shallow.
Eventually after some heavy duty negotiations, the government decided to supply
shallow mining industries with only 90% of their previous requirements [as
they could cut back a fair way] and to supply the deep level mines with 95%
of their needs, allowing production close to previous levels to resume again.
The
consequences -
For the entire report, [covering the consequences long-term and in the
near future] please visit www.GoldForecaster.com
This is a snippet from the recent issue of the weekly newsletter
from: www.GoldForecaster.com.
|