Managing Sector Funds in Portfolio Design

By: Richard Shaw | Fri, Apr 18, 2008
Print Email

If you intend to pursue US sector rotation investing with ETFs, you probably want to be sure that your choice of funds covers the entire US market without unintended gaps or overlaps in your exposure.

There are many funds with sector focus that pose a bewildering menu. On top of that is inconsistent labeling of levels by index companies, and fund descriptions using labels that are inconsistent with the labels used by the indexes they follow.

There are two industrial classifications systems competing for your attention. The older one from S&P and MSCI is called GICS (global industry classification standard). The newer one from Dow Jones and FTSE is called ICB (industry classification benchmark).

They each have 10 top levels, called "sectors" by GICS and called "industries" by ICB. Beyond the top level both the names and number of classes differ.

The GICS structure consists of 10 sectors, 24 industry groups, 67 industries and 147 sub-industries. The ICB structure consists of 10 industries, 19 supersectors, 41 sectors, and 114 subsectors.

The 10 top levels are very similar, but not the same. The consumer category is the most different between systems, as the table shows. They are not fungible. You would need to combine the two consumer categories of each for them to be equal.

Other differences exist. For example, ICB puts coal in their mining component of Materials, whereas GICS puts coal in the oil, gas and consumable fuels component of Energy.

When you read about or plan sector weights or industry weights, make sure you know which system, GICS or ICB, is referenced. The weights are not the same for each.

Note that in both systems, telecommunications equipment manufacture is in the Technology category, while telecommunications service provides are in the Telecommunications category.

The State Street sponsored sector ETFs are based on the 10 sector GICS system, but they have only 9 sector funds. State Street combines the Technology and Telecommunications sectors into a single ETF called Technology (XLK).

The Vanguard sponsored sector ETFs are also based on the GICS system, but they use all 10 sectors, keeping Technology (VGT) and Telecommunications (VOX) separate.

The Barclays sponsored sector ETFs are based on the ICB system, and they use all 10 industries of that system, but call them sectors, presumably because of common usage established years earlier by the GICS system.

The names of the sectors as they relate to top level sector ETFs from the three key sponsors are shown in the table, which also shows the broad US index fund from which the sector funds are derived.

Beyond sector funds are a plethora of subsector funds of varying degrees of granularity. If you use them, know whether they are based on GICS or ICB and read the structure of each classification system, so that you will know whether and to what degree you will overlap the holding of top level funds you may also own.

The links to the classification structures are:

Three practical ways to use top level sector funds are:

  1. own the broad index fund as a core position and then selectively overweight your portfolio toward a particular sector by buying some of that sector to supplement your core broad index position
  2. own all of the top level sector funds, instead of a core broad index fund, in whatever allocation policy weight you determine (presumably at or deviating from the overall market weights), then reallocate or rebalance from time to time
  3. do not own the core broad index fund; do own those sectors for which you are confident; and do not own those for which you are not confident (most aggressive and highest risk of the three approaches).

Subsector specialty funds, should probably only be used as "spice" here and there in conjunction with a core broad index fund.

Whatever, you do, a little bit of reading can help a lot. Relying on labels alone could give you a false sense of security. Be particularly careful when using sector funds from more than one sponsor to make sure you do not have unintended gaps or overlaps.



Richard Shaw

Author: Richard Shaw

Richard Shaw

Richard Shaw

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this material and our disclosed positions are as of July 5, 2010. Our opinions and positions may change as subsequent conditions vary. We are a fee-only investment advisor, and are compensated only by our clients. We do not sell securities, and do not receive any form of revenue or incentive from any source other than directly from clients. We are not affiliated with any securities dealer, any fund, any fund sponsor or any company issuer of any security. All of our published material is for informational purposes only, and is not personal investment advice to any specific person for any particular purpose. We utilize information sources that we believe to be reliable, but do not warrant the accuracy of those sources or our analysis. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance, and there is no guarantee that any forecast will come to pass. Do not rely solely on this material when making an investment decision. Other factors may be important too. Investment involves risks of loss of capital. Consider seeking professional advice before implementing your portfolio ideas.

IMPORTANT NOTE: We are a Registered Investment Advisor. We do not sell investments or control client assets. We are professional advisors compensated on an hourly basis or flat fee basis for portfolio management or for our coaching advice. Clients for personal investment advice receive recommendations and guidance tailored to their specific needs. Newsletters and research publications, are not personal investment advice, are generic in nature and should not be interpreted as specific advice for any specific person or situation. In our research, we utilize information sources that we believe are reliable, but do not warrant the accuracy of those sources or our analysis. Research, data and opinions expressed on this site are for information purposes only, are general in character and are not advice specific to any individual investor.

Copyright 2008-2017 by QVM Group LLC All rights reserved.

All Images, XHTML Renderings, and Source Code Copyright ©