• 288 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 288 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 290 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 690 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 695 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 697 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 700 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 700 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 701 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 703 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 703 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 707 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 707 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 708 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 710 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 711 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 714 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 715 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 715 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 717 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

This aging bull market may…

Billionaires Are Pushing Art To New Limits

Billionaires Are Pushing Art To New Limits

Welcome to Art Basel: The…

Trade In Counterfeit Goods Hits Half A Trillion Dollars

Trade In Counterfeit Goods Hits Half A Trillion Dollars

The counterfeit market has breached…

Daniel Aaronson

Daniel Aaronson

Continental Capital Advisors

Continental Capital Advisors, LLC was formed to offset the destruction of wealth caused by the global devaluation of currencies by central banks. The name Continental…

Contact Author

Lee Markowitz

Lee Markowitz

Continental Capital Advisors

 

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

The Federal Reserve's Market Corner Is Over

We previously wrote that the Federal Reserve's (Fed) quantitative easing program, aimed at driving fixed income asset prices higher and long-term interest rates lower, was a market corner similar to that of the Hunt Brothers' attempt with silver (www.continentalca.com/home/9252009). Given that all market corners eventually fail, the Fed's corner will as well, if for no other reason than that the Fed clearly laid out its strategy for entering and exiting the market. In contrast, during the Hunt's corner, market participants could only guess when the Hunts would exit the market.

The effectiveness of the Fed's corner is already in doubt as long-term interest rates rose during the entirety of the Fed's purchase program and recently hit new cycle highs. This means that the Fed already has losses on its holdings. Should long-term interest rates increase further the Fed will generate even greater losses. This could lead the market to question the Federal Reserve's solvency, which would dwarf the consequences of higher interest rates on an already weak housing market and heavily indebted Government.

The Fed's balance sheet is now encumbered with an additional $1.75 trillion of fixed income assets accumulated during the Fed's quantitative easing program. Figure 1 shows the growth in the Fed's securities portfolio from $500 billion at December 31, 2008 to just over $2 trillion as of March 31, 2010. This increase amounts to greater than 10% of US GDP and is nearly two times the assets of PIMCO, the world's largest bond fund manager.

Figure 1. Federal Reserve Securities Portfolio
Federal Reserve: Securities Held Outright
Source: Continental Capital Advisors, Federal Reserve

Figure 2 shows the Fed's purchases of mortgage-backed securities, which increased from zero as of December 31, 2008 to over $1 trillion today. Note that $300 billion of purchases occurred during March 2009 and April 2009 when mortgages were at their highest prices/lowest yields (Figure 3). Clearly, the Fed's announcements that it planned to purchase MBS allowed market participants to front run the Fed.

Figure 2. Federal Reserve Mortgage-Backed Securities
Federal Reserve: Mortgage Backed Securities
Source: Continental Capital Advisors, Federal Reserve

As shown in Figure 3, mortgage rates have been rising since the beginning of the Fed's purchase program.

Figure 3. Mortgage Bond Yields (30 Year Fannie Mae Coupon)
Mortgage Bond Yields (30-Year Fannie Mae Coupon)
Source: Bloomberg

Treasury holdings, shown in Figure 4, have increased from $400 billion to $700 billion as of March 31, 2010. As with mortgage-backed securities, Treasuries have also declined in price despite the Fed's purchases (Figure 5).

Figure 4. Federal Reserve Treasury Securities
Federal Reserve: US Treasury Notes
Source: Continental Capital Advisors, Federal Reserve

Figure 5. 10-Year Treasury Yield
10-Year US Treasury Yield
Source: Bloomberg

Impact of Mark-to-Market Losses on the Federal Reserve's Solvency

While most investors and commentators concentrate on the impact that higher interest rates will have on the housing market and US government finances, the mark-to-market losses of the Fed is a much more important issue because they can undermine the Fed's credibility and raise concerns about insolvency. Some investors will argue that the Fed has the ability to hold the recently accumulated securities to maturity. However, this is irrelevant if the market begins to focus on the Fed's losses as it did with Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers.

The Fed's asset purchases have increased its leverage. Measuring the Fed's leverage by its equity/assets ratio and adjusting it for the current market value of its gold holdings, the Fed's leverage has deteriorated from nearly 20% in 2007 to 13% today (its assets/equity ratio has grown from 5x to over 7.5x) (Figure 6). If the Fed's assets were to fall by 13%, the Fed's equity would be wiped away. Importantly, a 13% decline in asset values is foreseeable. For example, if 10-year Treasury rates rise from 4% to 5.5%, the Fed would lose over 10% on its 10-year notes. Moreover, a 1.5% increase in 30-year mortgage yields would lead to a greater than 20% loss on its 30-year mortgages.

Figure 6. Federal Reserve Balance Sheet (Adjusted for Market Value of Gold)
Federal Reserve Balance Sheet (Adjusted for Market Value of Gold)
Source: Continental Capital Advisors, Federal Reserve

Those who are not concerned about the negative consequences of money printing will argue that the Fed's solvency can never be questioned because of its ability to issue new Dollars to offset its losses. However, markets are unrelenting when the question of solvency is raised. When the Fed's solvency becomes a concern to markets, it will already be too late as the Dollar will be in freefall. The issuance of even more Dollars will be ineffective in restoring the market's confidence in the Fed.

The Fed's massive buying spree has fueled the ascent of most asset markets. While the rise in asset prices was likely the Fed's goal, the method used to achieve its goal will result in a disastrous outcome. Given that all corners fail, the Fed's attempt to corner the fixed income market will as well. Although investors are euphoric over rising stock and bond prices, sentiment will change when the Fed suffers the same fate as the Hunt Brothers.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment