|
September 30, 2008 Cost of Bailout Per Taxpayer by Income |
|
|
September 29th, 2008 The bailout of Wall Street may not have ultimate costs as high as the nominal bailout amount, but the interest payments on the debt will come due immediately, and the recoveries from Wall Street, if any, will take many years. The impact of the bailout which will surely happen in one form or the other, will impact taxes, interest rates, the exchange rate of the Dollar, imports and exports, foreign direct investment both in and out of the US, corporate sales and profits, and a long list of economic and investment dimensions too long to mention and to unknowable to predict. You can bet that your investments will be heavily impacted -- fixed income (proxies AGG and IEF), domestic equities (proxies SPY and VTI), international equities (proxies EFA and EEM), real estate (proxy VNQ), commodities (proxies DJP, USO and GLD), currencies (proxies UUP and UDN) and other types of investments will all be impacted. It's too soon for us to come up with investment or disinvestment recommendations we're willing to publish. However, one big factor in how things play out is the size of the tab for the bailout on a per investor basis. We've noodled some costs we'd like to share with you here. Per Taxpayer Annual Costs: Who will pay how much and for how long for the bailout? With the assumptions below, how much would taxpayers in each bracket have to pay per year for 30 years to support the debt service on the bonds issued for the bailout, assuming 30-year amortization of a sinking fund?
The annual cost per average taxpayer is $439, but the distribution among income segments is tremendously skewed. The bill for the top 1% of taxpayers is a shocking $173,000 per year. The annual bill for the bottom 50% of taxpayers is an easy $27. The image below shows the annual cost for the following income segments of taxpayers based on 2005 tax demographics from the IRS:
Good luck to us all. P.S. We don't know all the history behind mark-to-market accounting rules, but wouldn't temporarily creating more asset valuation flexibility in this locked-up credit market improve capital ratios and reduce the capital infusion requirements, reducing the size of the needed bailout, and grease the wheels of credit a bit?
|
|
Richard Shaw Copyright © 2008-2009 QVM Group LLC Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009 SafeHaven.com ADVERTISEMENTS
« BullionVault.com
-- Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices »
« Honest Money: A History of U.S. Gold & Silver Currency -- by Douglas V. Gnazzo Maestro, My Ass! -- by Michael Ashton » « Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please visit RSSHelp for instructions. » |