|
February 21, 2006 Weekly Wrap-up: Solid Price Action with Some Negative Divergences |
|
|
The following article was originally published at The Agile Trader on Sunday, February 19, 2006. Dear Speculators, The Dynamic Trading System fared well again last week, taking a profit on SPX instruments. SPY traders took a +1.2% gain off the table while auto-trade subscribers to The Agile Trader Index Futures Service netted +14% on capital. The System has been on a tear this year, closing 8 straight winning trades for +134% in net trading gains without a loser. And since the Index System's launch in mid July it has closed trades at a 75% win rate, in line with long-term historical back-testing, racking up +346% in net trading gains and a total return of +95%, net of all commissions and fees. (Note: Trading Gains are defined as the sum of percentage gains and losses on individual trades. Total Return is defined as the portfolio's percentage gain relative to its initial value. Because the portfolio does not allocate 100% of assets to each trade these figures are not identical.) Of course the System may not always perform as it has over the past 7 months. And past performance is not a guarantee of future results. But so far, so good. And we'll continue to trade the System's signals carefully and with discipline. **** **** **** Let' check in on how the market is doing relative to our forecast for 2006. If you'll recall previous weeks, we've been looking for the market to top out by mid February, which is right where we are now.
The analogues of 1966 and 1994 are still in our minds as we anticipate that a move lower into October of this year will be forthcoming. The correlations noted on this chart are continuing to improve, albeit fractionally. And they will continue to do so if the market follows the script that they have written. However, if those correlations begin to deteriorate then we'll have an indication that the market may be planning to diverge from the script (and continue to rally). This past week's rally left the SPX at a weekly close just -0.4 points below its Jan. 13 weekly close of 1287.6. And there are several ways to look at this story as it unfolds.
This weekly chart of the S PX is busy with a horizontal support line (black at 1245), a parallel trend zone (bullish in pink), and 2 possible longer-term lines of rising lows (red -- one intact the other broken). The SPX is above important support (1245), at the top of a parallel trend zone (regression to the bottom would imply a test down toward 1200), and either holding support on top of an intact trendline or rallying up to test a broken trendline from below, depending on your predisposition. Any way you slice it price levels are solid, but momentum measures are deteriorating. So, how should we think about this chart? Let's go to our confirming/diverging indices to get a broader perspective:
The overall impression from the broad market is pretty positive, though there are some yellow warnings flags in terms of momentum and Relative Strength. Market internals are of interest as well:
BOTTOM LINE: While our cyclical outlook calls for a market top to be forming now, there are few signs of significant price deterioration on the indices. That said, we do have a number of warning signs on Momentum and Relative Strength. So, will the broad market follow the SOX and the Transports higher or will it follow the Nasdaq 100 lower? The 2 nd half of February could be key in determining the next mid-term trend. **** **** **** EARNINGS, VALUATION, AND THE YIELD CURVE
The SPX's Consensus Forward 52W EPS Estimate (blue line) continues to creep higher. However, since consensus estimate for '07 i not out yet, the forward series (blue line) is using a proxy for 1Q07, and so it will be subject to revision. Trailing 52W Operating EPS (yellow line) ticked down for the first time since October last week. Downward revisions to EPS for the financial sector in 4Q05 were responsible. Moreover, the consensus for 1H06 is also being revised downward.
Should these downward trends in revisions continue, that could create some problems on the following chart.
Currently the Y/Y growth in the F52W EPS estimate (blue line) is at a robust +14%. However the 3-month annualized rate of change (red line) has fallen sharply. A quick rebound on the red line could save the blue line from a decline below the +10% level. But if the red line cannot rebound, then the blue line will begin a more serious descent. And, as we have discussed in the past, when the blue line is either declining below +10% or is below the ZERO line, the market generally provides some problems for the bulls. So, stay tuned. With the Yield Curve already inverted at terms between 6 months and 30 years...
...most "carry trades" (borrow short-term and lend long-term) now carry an intrinsic cost rather than an imbedded profit margin. And that makes it more difficult to borrow money...which in turn, often works as a brake on economic growth. With the difference between the yield on the 10-Yr Treasury and the Fed Funds Rate just a hair above ZERO...
...the entire curve is now on the verge of getting dunked under water. The market's recent optimism suggests that it believes that the Fed is just about done and that the Curve will steepen again soon. We see that optimism in the PE -- red line -- beginning to rise ahead of the blue line on the chart above. Now, generally the market's PE does tend to lead the yield curve (note how the red line fell ahead of the blue line in '04). But if the Fed continues to tighten, and/or if foreign central banks continue to buy longer-dated US Treasuries, thereby driving down long-term interest rates, then the Curve will go deep underwater and we could very well see existing "carry trades" forcibly unwound. And that could have some ugly consequences. With inflationary pressures mounting (capacity utilization is tightening, employment markets are taking up slack, upward trends in commodity prices are not yet broken, headline CPI is rising, long-term rates are too far below nominal GDP to NOT be inflationary) the Fed may be FORCED to continue to raise rates beyond (whatever is) NEUTRAL. Our cyclically bearish outlook for a market retrenchment between now and October hinges on the Yield Curve's full-on inversion. Should the Fed manage to avert that inversion (or avert its being sustained and severe) then it's possible that such a retrenchment could be averted. Any way you slice it, we suspect that 2006 will see market volatility rise significantly, and that should be a net positive for our Dynamic Trading System's results, as the System tends to thrive on volatility. Have a great week! Best regards and good trading! |
|
Adam Oliensis, IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES ALL PERFORMANCE RESULTS ARE HYPOTHETICAL. HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS HAVE MANY INHERENT LIMITATIONS, SOME OF WHICH ARE DESCRIBED BELOW. NO REPRESENTATION IS BEING MADE THAT ANY ACCOUNT WILL OR IS LIKELY TO ACHIEVE PROFITS OR LOSSES SIMILAR TO THOSE SHOWN. IN FACT, THERE ARE FREQUENTLY SHARP DIFFERENCES BETWEEN HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND THE ACTUAL RESULTS SUBSEQUENTLY ACHIEVED BY ANY PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM. ONE OF THE LIMITATIONS OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS IS THAT THEY ARE GENERALLY PREPARED WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT. IN ADDITION, HYPOTHETICAL TRADING DOES NOT INVOLVE FINANCIAL RISK, AND NO HYPOTHETICAL TRADING RECORD CAN COMPLETELY ACCOUNT FOR THE IMPACT OF FINANCIAL RISK IN ACTUAL TRADING. FOR EXAMPLE, THE ABILITY TO WITHSTAND LOSSES OR ADHERE TO A PARTICULAR TRADING PROGRAM IN SPITE OF TRADING LOSSES ARE MATERIAL POINTS WHICH CAN ALSO ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. THERE ARE NUMEROUS OTHER FACTORS RELATED TO THE MARKET IN GENERAL OR TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ANY SPECIFIC TRADING PROGRAM WHICH CANNOT BE FULLY ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PREPARATION OF HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS AND ALL OF WHICH CAN ADVERSELY AFFECT ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS. DOG DREAMS UNLIMITED INC.(DDUI), WHICH OWNS AND OPERATES THE AGILE TRADER, HAS HAD LITTLE OR NO EXPERIENCE IN TRADING ACTUAL ACCOUNTS FOR ITSELF OR FOR CUSTOMERS. BECAUSE THERE ARE NO ACTUAL TRADING RESULTS TO COMPARE TO THE HYPOTHETICAL RESULTS, CUSTOMERS SHOULD BE PARTICULARLY WARY OF PLACING UNDUE RELIANCE ON THESE HYPOTHETICAL PERFORMANCE RESULTS. Trading commodity futures may involve large potential rewards, but also carries large potential risks. You must be aware of the risks and be willing to accept them in order to invest in the futures markets. Dont trade with money that you cannot afford to lose. The past performance of any trading system or methodology is not necessarily indicative of future results. The Agile Trader and all individuals affiliated with The Agile Trader assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. As a publisher of a financial newsletter of general and regular circulation, The Agile Trader cannot tender individual investment advice on the suitability and performance of your portfolio or specific investments. Refer to your registered investment adviser for individualized advice. In making any investment decision, you will rely solely on your own review and examination of the facts and the records relating to such investments. Past performance of our recommendations is not an indication of future performance. The publisher shall have no liability of whatever nature in respect to any claims, damage, loss, or expense arising out of or in connection with the reliance by you on the contents of our Web site, any promotion, published material, alert, or update. Trading commodity futures involves substantial risk of loss. DDUI and all individuals affiliated with DDUI assume no responsibilities for your trading and investment results. Copyright © 2003-2009 The Agile Trader, LLC All rights reserved. Image rendition and html coding Copyright © 2000-2009 SafeHaven.com ADVERTISEMENTS
« BullionVault.com
-- Buy gold online - quickly, safely and at low prices »
« Honest Money: A History of U.S. Gold & Silver Currency -- by Douglas V. Gnazzo Maestro, My Ass! -- by Michael Ashton » « Opinions expressed at SafeHaven are those of the individual authors and do not necessarily represent the opinion of SafeHaven or its management. Articles are available via RSS/XML. Please visit RSSHelp for instructions. » |