• 968 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 968 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 970 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,370 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,375 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,376 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,380 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,380 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,381 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,382 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,383 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,387 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,387 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,388 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,390 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,390 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,394 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,395 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,395 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,397 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Extension of Post Coppock Curve Buy Signal Patterns

This is an extension of my June 27, 2003 communication:

The extension consists of charting the second 250 trading days after each signal rather than the first 250 trading days.




The various pattern pairs have now dissipated to the extent that they are hard to recognize this long after their respective Coppock Curve buy signals.

Still, line charts of the two relevant coordinates shown in my February 24, 2004 and April 24, 2004 communications suggest that the pattern pairs persist.

However, post-signal evidence obtained via a different model, and presented in my June 1, 2004 communication, indicates that all post-signal patterns are somewhat alike anyway, implying that the search for pattern pairs becomes more difficult the farther beyond in time the end dates of any patterns lie from their respective signal dates.

Nevertheless, for curiosity's sake, I will continue to update.

PS: Note that I now use 8/31/82 as a buy signal date, rather than 9/30/82 which I erroneously used heretofore.

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment