• 309 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 310 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 311 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 711 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 716 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 718 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 721 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 721 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 722 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 724 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 724 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 728 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 728 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 729 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 731 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 732 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 735 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 736 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 736 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 738 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
How Millennials Are Reshaping Real Estate

How Millennials Are Reshaping Real Estate

The real estate market is…

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

This aging bull market may…

Strong U.S. Dollar Weighs On Blue Chip Earnings

Strong U.S. Dollar Weighs On Blue Chip Earnings

Earnings season is well underway,…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Man Versus Nature

I think a great deal about causation. Predominantly because we tend to get it wrong so often - yet find what we need in what we see. You can do quite well not worrying about causation as a trader and focus on what actually isright in front of you. Ignorance is bliss, especially if you rely on a system to execute your trades.

As a curious participant, I find great interest in attempting to understand what likely is much simpler than we typically make it. Or perhaps it's just more of an existential expression of many different things.

It simply is what it is - not what it should be.

The fact that on any given day you will hear with great conviction why the market did what it did from perspectives as varied as an old fashioned candy store, is proof to its almost mystical and amorphous composition.

Trends continue because of many different forces and relationships. Long term trends - trends that have been in place for decades - can and will continue with even greater uncertainty as to what is actually causing them to continue.

The US government bond market is one of those forces of nature. Alan Greenspan liked to refer to it as The Conundrum>.

Perhaps if he had taken a peak at the historical charts of the US government bond market it would have helped provide greater context and expectations towards the future.

200 Years - Gov't Bond Yields
Larger Image

It is hard to deny that there is at the very least asymmetry in the above chart with regards to each respective rate cycle (trough to new lows). The present cycle (approximately 70 years) is actually following the greatest degree of symmetry - likely because of the historic spike in interest rates in the early 1980's drawing out the trend. In both the previous cycles shown (~ 60 and 55 years, respectively), the final leg down is swift. However, once the previous cycle low was broken, rates tended to base for an extended period of time.

The chart reflects why I find the comparisons to the 1970's period of stagflation so misplaced. In the 1970's, inflation was on an upswing for over 20 years and on its way towards historic highs. Today we have the opposite dynamic with rates drifting towards historic lows. The two rate and inflation environments couldn't be more diametrically opposed.

As a parting thought, the chart and current rate environment also speaks to the futility of the recent comments and illusions of causation from the likes of Bill Gross at Pimco. You could say it's another example of man versus nature. Mr. Gross could very well have had excellent reasoning and rationale as to why he expects yields to rise. However, nature (the market) will always be the great humbler of even the savviest participants. She will walk and romp where she pleases.

I'm sure that realization keeps Ben Bernanke up very late at night.

More to come in this line of thinking.

 

I just joined Twitter. All my trades and occasional market musings are disclosed in real-time here.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment