• 310 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 310 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 312 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 712 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 717 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 719 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 722 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 722 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 723 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 725 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 725 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 729 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 729 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 730 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 732 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 733 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 736 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 737 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 737 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 739 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Gold Exploration: The Next Leg of the Bull Market?

The following was sent to subscribers of Institutional Advisors on September 19, 2006.

Overview: Gold's real price has long been the key to profitability of mining, as well as to cyclical opportunities, often opposite to the direction of the general stock market.

Historically, the CPI in the senior economy has provided the best determination of gold's real price, but the calculation of the U.S. CPI has become suspect.

A better alternative has been our gold/commodities index, which is calculated daily. This is a sound proxy of gold's real price, that also represents purchasing power or mining profitability.

This has suffered a significant decline since January and this has been accompanied by a relentless decline in many gold exploration stocks.

This study concludes that these, as well as the real price, are close to setting a cyclical bottom in anticipation of a lengthy new bull market. Within this, gold stocks should outperform the bullion price as the exploration sector becomes the equivalent of the junior tech stocks in the mid- 1990s.

The role of the latter was to fund a great innovation in technology and business. The role of gold's real price and the exploration sector is to meet an extraordinary increase in investment demand for gold that typically follows an era of remarkable credit expansion.

Historical: Another term for gold's real price is money and, typically, during a great boom in tangible and financial assets (think industrial commodities and real estate, as well as stocks and corporate bonds), money, or gold's real price, loses purchasing power.

The very big asset inflations include the "Roaring Twenties", which ended so dramatically in 1929. Other examples concluded in 1873 and 1825, with the earliest example being the 1720 South Sea Bubble.

In all such examples, gold's real price declined to a significant low as speculators scorned cash and leveraged up on the hot stories about stocks, bonds, commodities, and real estate.

Once the era of asset inflation exhausted itself, typically gold's real price increased for some twenty years.

One explanation is that during the leveraged manias, reckless borrowing and equally reckless lending expands credit to an unsustainable level.

In all cases, once the speculative boom breaks it has been followed by a sudden and pervasive loss of liquidity. Under similar devastating conditions, legions of intellectuals and experimental economists have recommended that some agency apply more credit.

Interestingly, since as early as 1622 severe liquidity vacuums regularly inspire such impractical visions, but typically Mother Nature finds it more practical to replenish global banking liquidity by increasing the supply of gold.

This is prompted by increasing investment demand, which in all cases has been anticipated by changes in the credit markets. Other than the exhaustion of speculative momentum, key determinants have been a turn to widening of credit spreads as market forces begin to ration the availability of credit for speculation. This happens with or without the defiance or cooperation of policymakers.

While the action in stocks usually commands most of the attention in a financial mania, speculative excesses also build up in the credit markets. The above paragraph reviews the spreads between high and low grade credits. Another aspect is the mania to borrow short term and lend out longer term. Popularly called "the carry", this time around ostensibly extremely low deposit rates in Japan were ambitiously used to obtain higher rates elsewhere.

Typically, the height of a mania is accompanied by speculative demand for credit driving short-dated rates up relative to long-dated bonds. Just as typically, the end of speculation is marked by the reversal of the yield curve to steepening.

On this, treasury bill rates decline in yield as long rates increase.

Typically, this has occurred in the Fall of the year that the mania climaxed. This was the case in 2000, 1929, and 1873, just to list the most recent.

Also, in each of these, gold's real price turned up and initiated a lengthy bull market for the gold sector. Within this, the exploration sector provided outstanding performance.

Of course, the usual 3 to 5-year business cycle prevailed and the gold sector action was essentially contra-cyclical.

Near-Term: It is important to emphasize gold's real price. During its bear market into 1929, gold stocks underperformed the stock market as earnings declined due to rising costs. For example, Homestake's earnings declined from .73 to .52 per share in 1929 with no change in the nominal price, which was fixed at 20.67 per ounce.

Then on the post-bubble contraction, earnings jumped from .74 to 1.24 in 1932 with no change in gold's nominal price. (This did not change until later in 1933.)

The improvement was due to the increase in gold's price relative to the costs of mining. On this, Homestake's stock soared from 8 ~ in late 1929 to 20 ¼ in December, 1932.

1929 TO 1932
STOCK EARNINGS DIVIDENDS GOLD
+ 149% + 138% + 52% Unchanged

This was indicative of the industry and, although junior stock quotations are not readily available, the exploration sector soared. There is a reliable report about a young mining broker in Montreal having such a good year in 1933 that one of his larger accounts gave him a new Ford Roadster.

Of course, the driving force (no pun intended) was that gold's real price was improving and in 1933 the FDR administration found academic reasons to join the fun and raised the nominal price from 20.67 to 35.

Canada's premier producer was Dome Mines and, on the full move, the stock soared from 3 in 1929 to 34 ~ . Earnings soared from .05 to 2.11 and from 1934 until 1941 the dividend was 2.00, which was a handsome return on the 3-dollar low.

The discovery that led to the Dome mine was made in 1909, and it is now the longest continuously operating gold mine in North America.

Current Conditions: Mark Twain defined a mine as a "hole in the ground with a liar standing next to it ".

Be that as it may, but every mine started as a discovery which, in most cases, was made through prospecting or exploration. The biggest mining companies in the world have been the result.

As Mark Twain quipped, mining promotion has had a colourful history, but this began to change in the early 1980s when the real price of base and precious metals began a lengthy decline.

With accountants facing the daunting prospect of shrinking cash flow, big mining companies reduced their exploration staff. As an example, Placer had one of the great mine-finding teams in history and key members, in being forced out, became successful entrepreneurs in mining exploration. Now big companies are facing the daunting prospect of inadequate reserves.

In the "old" days, a prospector would take a showing to a promoter, who would engage a consulting geologist to write up a report. This would be used to promote the stock and raise some money.

The relentless energy of promoters required a continuous stream of "stories" and, given probability, eventually discoveries were made.

Over the past twenty years or so, highly experienced professionals in exploration have been initiating projects and raising capital.

The result is an unusual combination of a high degree of motivation with a methodical approach to business and exploration. Success so far has made the Toronto stock market the leading exchange for mine finance.

And, as we've recently seen, from the top of the hierarchy from major to intermediate sized mining companies have been acquiring gold reserves through acquisition or merger.

Wrap: Of the attached charts, the final one shows the behaviour of gold's deflated price through all six of the great financial bubbles back to the first one in 1720.

Gold's real price declined to a significant low with the mania and then recovered during the initial contraction. Typically, gold's subsequent recovery has been lengthy, with setbacks occurring within the usual 4 to 5 year business cycle.

The other charts review this pattern through the bubble that climaxed in 1Q 2000 and the boom that seems to be peaking in 2006.

With these, it is evident that the gold exploration sector moves more directly with changes in gold's real price rather than with the nominal price. Very few researchers have been using gold's real price so the link from this to market participants remains curious, but it works.

The next step to appreciating the opportunities present in the gold exploration sector is that the real price has been in a steady decline since January, 2006. This has depressed the stocks of some well positioned exploration companies.

As outlined above, this appears to be close to a cyclical low for our gold/commodities index and conditions in the credit markets are changing in a manner that typically anticipates a cyclical increase in the investment demand.

This could inspire all aspects of the gold mining industry.

For investors who can handle today's relative illiquidity in the exploration sector, the risk/reward opportunities are outstanding.

GOLD STOCKS AND THE REAL PRICE - 2000

  • In the Fall of 2000, the HUI turned up with our gold/commodities index (G/C).
  • Gold's nominal price didn't turn up until May, 2001.
  • By that "breakout" the HUI was up 60%.
  • Note how the G/C index rose as the dollar was strengthening. At times then, the real price is more important than the course of the dollar and the nominal price.

GOLD STOCKS AND THE REAL PRICE - 2006

  • Exploration stocks have conformed to the slump in the G/C since January.
  • The real price is attempting to bottom.
  • This is accompanied by changes in the credit markets that typically anticipate a significant increase in the investment demand for gold.

Deflated Gold Prices and Financial Bubbles

The charts below record the behaviour of gold's real price through all six of the great financial bubbles in history. Data are in senior currency terms.

Analysis of gold's real price has avoided the problems deriving from a sole focus upon the nominal price and dollar depreciation. Since late 2003, mining costs have been rising relative to gold's price. This adversity seems close to ending.

Analyzing gold's real price and its consistent behaviour during the remarkable financial volatility of our times has been an important adjunct to orthodox determinations about the character and timing of the Indian Monsoon, gossip in the Middle East "Souks" and the schemes of central bankers, as well as estimates of jewelry consumption, which typically increases during a bubble and slumps with the consequent contraction.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment