• 314 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 315 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 316 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 716 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 721 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 723 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 726 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 726 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 727 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 729 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 729 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 733 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 733 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 734 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 736 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 737 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 740 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 741 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 741 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 743 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
Market Sentiment At Its Lowest In 10 Months

Market Sentiment At Its Lowest In 10 Months

Stocks sold off last week…

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

An economic slowdown in many…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

"Oh, Poor Me!" The Stock Holders Lament

"...All investing is risky - all the way down to zero. And if government steps in to bail out a business, it should've gone to the wall in the first place..."

JUST IN CASE YOU'D forgotten - or you've set up a hedge fund in London lately - shareholders come last in line when a listed company goes bust.

Yes, yes...you get to vote on who sits on the board of directors. You might even get first dibs on any new share issues set to dilute your investment, too.

But you'll typically get nothing if the company goes bankrupt. And any business that hits the wall, as a rule, tends to go bust because it's run out of cash.

So standing behind creditors and bondholders, waiting to collect whatever money is left, you can forget about how you'll spend your share of the pay-out.

Worth remembering next time you spot a stock chart like this...

See that precipitous plunge starting in June of last year...?

That's where two chunky hedge funds, RAB Capital in London and SRM Global of Monaco, began piling into Northern Rock - one of the UK's top five mortgage banks - building a stake between them that's now worth a lot less than it was.

On New Year's Eve, for instance, RAB took its stake to fully 7.5% of Northern Rock's stock, even though its September investment had already shrunk by more than one half. (The price of NRK has since lost another fifth, going from £0.84 to £0.68.)

The logic?

"The Company is a strong and viable business," claims SRM, now holding some 10% of the stock. In an open letter to other Northern Rock shareholders at the start of January, "it is nothing like the 'lame duck' that some would have you believe," the Monaco money-men said.

"We are shareholders in a company that has true value in its assets, its brand and its employees."

Problem is, SRM and RAB are indeed merely shareholders - and Northern Rock's "true value" also includes an emergency loan of £26 billion ($50bn) funded by UK taxpayers, plus an explicit promise from government of a further £30bn ($59bn) guaranteeing the cash deposits of the bank's saving customers.

Those customers stand right at the front of the creditors' queue, of course. Anyone holding bank stocks today might do well to remember that before bleating about "true value".

"SRM believes that the Company's book value is materially in excess of its current share price," the hedge fund lamented in its open letter, "[and] SRM believes that any sale of assets and/or business of the Company at below its true value is detrimental to the Company and to its shareholders...

"The Company's liquidity can be restored [but] the Company currently finds itself in exceptional circumstances and in these circumstances shareholders cannot rely upon the usual safeguards, including those of seeking shareholder consent for significant transactions."

Hence the Extraordinary General Meeting called for this week by RAB and SRM. Both were desperate to stop the nationalization of NRK's debts becoming a nationalization of its assets as well. So they raised a motion to limit how far the Board of Directors could dilute existing stockholdings in any private-sector rescue plan.

"Roughly two-thirds of shareholders, taking into account proxies, voted in favor of all of SRM and RAB Capital's four resolutions," notes Martin Flanagan in The Scotsman.

"The trouble was that three of them required 75% majorities."

So much for shareholder activism! Fewer than 600 people attended the EGM in person, according to The Daily Telegraph. The two hedge-fund managers had hoped for 8,400 to fill the arena they'd hired in Newcastle.

And as for "exceptional circumstances" whacking Northern Rock back in September, its perfectly sound strategy relied on short-term credit to such an extent that it had to beggar the Bank of England for emergency loans within days of the credit crunch biting. If RAB thought the assets and balance-sheet were so solid then, why didn't it pile in above £10 a share?

SRM now claims - and City rumor agrees - that the sudden and vicious shutdown of the world's short-term credit markets in the summer hit several other major UK mortgage banks, too. No naming names, but if the City dumped NRK because it knew the true extent of Northern Rock's woes, then what are private investors - you know, the little guy - to make of NRK's major competitors?

Their average 44% loss since the start of '07 compares with a mere 6% drop in the broader FTSE All-Share index.

And given that UK house prices have only just tipped lower after surging for 12 years, you might think the City bankers trying to arrange short-term loans for the mortgage lenders had "a word" or two with their equity desks, too.

Glancing at Northern Rock's chart, you might even guess you were right. But of course, that wouldn't be allowed, not with the City's much-vaunted "Chinese walls" to prevent it. Regulations forbid it!

"One of Britain's biggest property funds was forced to shut its doors to withdrawals [this week] after the slump in commercial prices triggered panic selling by small investors," reports The Guardian. "Scottish Equitable said that 129,000 small investors in its £2 billion property fund [$3.9bn] will not be able to access their money for up to a year..."

"It emerged yesterday that staff at some of the property managers have been informing key clients in advance that a fund is heading for suspension. The [financial watchdog] FSA said that such trading may fall foul of its rules regarding treating customers fairly."

Ooh, get you! Wouldn't want to let "key clients" find their way to the exit while private investors use nothing but Google as a flashlight now, would we?

"There are lots of rumors going about that other providers may be considering following Friends Provident and Aegon," says Jason Hemmings of Albannach Financial Management in Edinburgh.

Friends Provident closed its property fund to withdrawals in December. Aegon runs the Scottish Equitable fund, now closed to new business and closed to withdrawals for 12 months or more.

Whoever's next, you can bet the City regulators - the Financial Services Authority - will be right on top of any "unfair treatment". Just like they kept on top of the collapse at Northern Rock, avoiding disaster, panic and a huge tax-funded bail out with no near-term hope of repayment.

"I was surprised they were not more angry," said Bryan Sanderson, chairman at the Northern Rock EGM, of the smaller investors who attended the meeting this week.

"They behaved very well indeed, which is a testimony to them all."

Well, maybe. Either that, or the little guys' good behavior shows that NRK's smaller stockholders have accepted what the hedge funds will not:

All investing is risky - all the way down to zero. If you want property rights with no risk of default, then you should Buy Gold outright. Shareholders get squat when things go to the wall. (Even cash-savers are mere creditors, sitting on risk that few if any accept.)

And if government steps in to bail out a business, it should've gone to the wall anyway.

Sure, the mortgage-book assets of NRK outweigh the tax-funded obligations, net-net. But a bank that needs a $50bn loan just to stay afloat...after suffering the first British banking run in well over a century...is hardly what you'd call a going concern.

Not unless you're trying to nick a quick profit, buying the shares amid a 95% plunge, and gambling on a free-market takeover in the teeth of a very tax-funded rescue.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment