• 396 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 396 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 398 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 798 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 803 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 805 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 808 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 808 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 809 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 811 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 811 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 815 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 815 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 816 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 818 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 819 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 822 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 823 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 823 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 825 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Capitulation Among the Oil Shorts?

June 8, 2008

Dear Subscribers,

Let us begin our commentary with a review of our 8 most recent signals in our DJIA Timing System:

1st signal entered: 50% long position on September 7, 2006 at 11,385;

2nd signal entered: Additional 50% long position on September 25, 2006 at 11,505;

3rd signal entered: 100% long position SOLD on May 8, 2007 at 13,299, giving us gains of 1,914 and 1,794 points, respectively.

4th signal entered: 50% short position on October 4, 2007 at 13,956;

5th signal entered: 50% short position COVERED on January 9, 2008 at 12,630, giving us a gain of 1,326 points.

6th signal entered: 50% long position on January 9, 2008 at 12,630;

7th signal entered: Additional 50% long position on January 22, 2008 at 11,715;

8th signal entered: 100% long position SOLD on May 22, 2008 at 12,640, giving us gains of 925 and 10 points, respectively.

While I believed the US stock market would struggle over the summer when we decided to sell our 100% long position in our DJIA Timing System on May 22nd, I had not expected the weakness to come so soon. With a NYSE ARMS reading of 2.61 and a NASDAQ ARMS reading of 2.07 last Friday, the stock market is now oversold in the short-run. Should the stock market experience more weakness come Monday morning (i.e. another sell-off of over 100 Dow points), we would most likely initiate a 50% long position in our DJIA Timing System for trading purposes. However, chances are that the Dow (which has been one of the weaker major market indices over the last few months) and most other major indices will bounce on Monday. On a longer multi-week timeframe, the Dow Industrials and the S&P 500 are still in somewhat neutral territory. Since the global financial markets are still not close to being fully functional (more on that in our following discussion on crude oil) - and given rising inflationary and slowdown fears in many parts of Asia - the "tail risk" embedded in both the US and global stock market still remain relatively high. As a result, we will continue to remain neutral in our DJIA Timing System, and will wait for the financial markets to "show us the money" before we will get back on the long side again (aside from a potential short-term trading setup tomorrow morning).

Let us now discuss our short to intermediate term views on crude oil prices. With the latest two-day US$16 spike in crude oil prices over the last two trading days, there is no denying that crude oil is now very overbought. In fact - as can be seen in the following chart showing the daily spot price of crude oil vs. its percentage deviation from its 200-day moving average over the last 25 years, the price of crude oil is now overbought both in the short-term and in the intermediate term (3 to 9 months):

Daily Spot Crude Oil vs Percentage Deviation from its 200-Day Moving Average (March 1983 to Present) - 1) George Soros made a substantial amount of money by shorting crude oil in late 1985/early 1986. Crude declines from over $31 in November 85 to just $11 by March 86. 2) Post *Gulf War 2* spike down - oil declines from $37 to $27 in just ten days. 3) Iraq invades Kuwait. 4) Oil peaks at $28 in December 96. Asia and Emerging market crisis hits in 97. Oil bottoms at $11 in December 98. 5) Since January 2007, the spot price of WTI crude oil has risen nearly 130% - from $60 to $138 a barrel as this is being published, or approximately 42% above its 200 DMA. This is even more overbought than what we witnessed in October 2004, when crude made a ST top at 37.60% above its 200 DMA. Make no mistake about it: Crude oil is now highly overbought.

As mentioned in the above chart, the spot price of crude oil is now about 42% above its 200-day moving average. Based on this measure, crude oil is now at its most overbought level since early March 2000 - when it was just coming off its all-time, inflation-adjusted lows made in December 1998! Prior to this "recovery period" of oil prices during late 1999 to early 2000, one would have to go back to late 1990 to witness a more overbought level, right after the Iraqi invasion of Kuwait and prior to the beginning of the first Gulf War.

The overbought situation in crude oil prices is also evident in the bottom panel in the following chart (courtesy of Decisionpoint.com). The bottom panel shows the ratio of the WTI crude oil prices versus the Goldman Sachs Industrials Metals Index:

Light Sweet Crude Oil (Continuous Contract) - Ratio now at a record high - suggesting that oil prices should at least correct over the short-run!

Over the past decade, it has generally been a good time to short oil and buy industrials metals once the ratio between WTI crude oil prices and the Goldman Sachs Industrials Metals Index reach a level near 0.30 or above. The ratio of the WTI price and the Goldman Sachs Industrials Metals Index is now at an all-time high. Moreover, previous spikes to similar levels (such as March 2003 and August 2005) have always led to at least a short-term (but significant) correction in oil prices. If one believes that oil and industrial metals prices are both good leading indicators of global economic growth, then there is no reason why the rate of change in these two "indicators" should diverge for any sustained period of time. While there are definitely supply issues within the crude oil market, one can also argue the same case for various industrial metals. Furthermore, we know that a significant demand destruction has not only taken place within the OECD countries, but also within emerging markets that have slashed their energy subsidies, including India (which raised gasoline prices by 11%), Malaysia (63% hike in Diesel prices), Indonesia, Bangladesh, and Sri Lanka. China, on the other hand, is the big player in the energy subsidy arena - but even if China fails to curtail its energy subsidies going forward (it doesn't have to, as its energy subsidies are not putting a dent in its budget), there is no doubt that Chinese economic growth has been slowing down as its export markets slowed and as the Chinese central bank continues to hike reserve requirements (rising from 16.5% to 17.0% on June 15th and 17.5% on June 25th). Over the short-run, demand destruction will continue to play a significant role (in the US, this is exemplified by the latest cut in domestic airline capacity by all across the board, which would in turn raise prices and cramp airline travel and jet fuel consumption).

Make no mistake, however, we are now also witnessing signs of capitulation among those players who have been on the short side of the crude oil futures market. Subscribers please consider the following:

  1. The balance sheet problems at many commercial and investment banks have made them reluctant to act in their natural roles by taking the other side of crude oil and general commodity speculators, including players such as fully-collateralized commodity funds from PIMCO and the USO ETF. Up until a few years ago, financial players have traditionally been long (i.e. they took the other side of the natural hedgers such as energy producers) - now, they are short. Given the breakdown of the roles among financial players, there is no question that the crude futures market (and the corn futures market) has broken down. Ironically, the general credit crunch - which in turn has led to a slowdown in credit creation and economic growth - has been partially responsible for the latest run-up in crude oil prices.
  2. The balance sheet problems, as well as the relentless rise in oil prices coming into last week and the bean counters' will in forcing "mark to market" accounting on energy producers, mean that many energy producers now have no ability to hedge their production, as many investment banks have become reluctant to extend margin loans to the smaller energy producers. The lack of hedging "pressure" to counteract the buying power from the index funds has no doubt added to the relentless rise in oil prices over the last few months.
  3. As an extension to points 1) and 2), this has also led the prime brokers to either clam down or cut back on margin loans to hedge funds who want to short oil - thus taking out other significant financial players on the short side as well. Note that raising margin requirements would not affect the long-side players, as commodity index funds and ETFs are in general, fully collateralized. If anything, raising margin requirements will put pressure on the short side, thus exacerbating the current rise in oil prices. Furthermore, the two-day spike in oil prices ending last Friday had all the signs of a capitulation and panic by those on the short side. I would not be surprised if some energy producers actually went into the market late last week to cover some of their long-term hedges - as a way to reduce or eliminate mark-to-market losses in upcoming earnings reports.

In other words, the latest spike in oil prices is mostly due to technical rather than fundamental reasons. With the $5 billion common stock offering just announced by Lehman Brothers, and with Barclays PLC now taping US$5 billion from sovereign wealth funds and potentially acquiring some of the weaker financial institutions (Lehman and UBS were mentioned), my sense is that this extraordinary combination of technical factors in the crude oil futures market is now close to an end. While crude oil prices may well be higher a couple of years from now, crude oil is definitely now due for a short-term and significant correction.

For those who believe oil prices may now be in a corrective phase, my main suggestion - aside from shorting oil or buy certain stocks in the consumer discretionary sector - would be to take a hard look at the domestic airline industry. Given the announced capacity cuts over the last few weeks, and given the upcoming merger between Northwest and Delta airlines, pricing power within the airline industry has dramatically increased. Moreover, many of the domestic airlines are now trading new bankruptcy prices, and assuming that Northwest Airlines announces bigger capacity cuts over the next few weeks, many of these airlines could double in a jiffy. Furthermore, the barriers to energy in the airline industry (which has historically been non-existent since the deregulation of the US airline industry in the late 1970s) has now gotten much higher, given:

  1. The lack of financing in this difficult credit environment - especially financing new ventures in the airline industry. Moreover, given the latest experiments with JetBlue (George Soros was an early investor) as well as Virgin America (which is predicted to be profitable within three years), my sense is that the appetite for funding new low-cost airline ventures has sunk to a new low.
  2. Boeing and Airbus cannot produce new planes fast enough for existing airlines, let alone new airlines who want to compete in the US domestic field. Also, the older planes that CAL just retired are too inefficient for competitors or new airlines to fly even if they could get the financing to buy or lease the planes;

Finally, even Southwest Airlines - who are 70% hedged this year and 55% hedged in 2009 at $51 a barrel, and 25% hedged in 2010 at $63 a barrel - has been expanding much more slowly than they have in the past. For those who want to take a closer look at the airline industry, I would suggest looking at liquidity risk first and foremost. This Morningstar article on the airlines may be a good start.

More follows for subscribers...


Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment