• 98 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 98 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 100 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 500 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 505 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 507 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 510 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 510 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 511 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 513 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 513 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 517 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 517 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 518 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 520 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 521 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 524 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 525 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 525 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 527 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

This aging bull market may…

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Forever 21 filed for Chapter…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

If the Fed Wants to Stimulate Bank Lending, Keep Its Target at 1.00%

After the release of the weak November employment data, the market more than ever expects the FOMC to reduce its federal funds rate target from the current 1.00%. But if the Fed really wants to stimulate bank credit extension to the private sector, it will leave its funds rate target level at 1.00% but keep flooding the market reserves so that the effective funds rate continues to trade below the target rate. As the chart below shows, since early in October, the effective federal funds rate has consistently traded below the FOMC target rate.

Chart 1

Why would a drop in the FOMC's target rate be a negative for bank lending? The banking system needs to earn higher profits to help recapitalize itself. The Fed now pays interest to depository institutions on both their required and excess reserves. The rate of interest paid on excess reserves is the lowest FOMC target rate during a reserve maintenance period. Non-depository institutions, such as the Federal Home Loan Banks, are not eligible to earn interest on their holdings of federal funds. When the Fed floods the financial system with reserves and these non-depository institutions end up with more federal funds than they need, they sell them in the market for whatever they can fetch. Banks that are able to purchase these federal funds at below-target rates can hold them as excess reserves, earning the spread with very little interest-rate risk. So, if the FOMC were to reduce its federal funds rate target, it would reduce the arbitrage profit spread depository institutions are currently earning, which would slow down the bank recapitalization process.

You might ask why the FOMC does not raise its fed funds target. After all, this would increase the arbitrage profits earned by depository institutions, thereby speeding the recapitalization process. The only problem with this is that the interest rates charged to banks' private-sector loan customers might be marked up, thus reducing the quantity of bank loans demanded. So, the Fed staffers might have to do some econometric work to see what target funds rate would maximize bank lending, balancing the recapitalization process, which argues for a higher target rate, with the loan demand, which argues for a lower target rate.


Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment