• 1,180 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 1,181 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 1,182 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,582 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,587 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,589 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,592 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,592 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,593 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,595 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,595 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,599 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,599 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,600 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,602 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,603 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,606 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,607 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,607 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,609 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

What's the Difference between Maddoff and U.S. Social Security?

Coercion. Both depend, or in the case of Maddoff, depended, on being able to get new contributors into the scheme in order to pay off the previous contributors. The Social Security Administration has the power of the law to force new contributors into its scheme. Maddoff did not have the power of the law to force new contributors into his scheme, therefore, he has been accused of breaking the law. Just another example of it's good to be the king.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment