• 972 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 972 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 974 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,374 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,379 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,381 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,384 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,384 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,385 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,387 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,387 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,391 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,391 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,392 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,394 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,395 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,398 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,399 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,399 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,401 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

What's the Difference between Maddoff and U.S. Social Security?

Coercion. Both depend, or in the case of Maddoff, depended, on being able to get new contributors into the scheme in order to pay off the previous contributors. The Social Security Administration has the power of the law to force new contributors into its scheme. Maddoff did not have the power of the law to force new contributors into his scheme, therefore, he has been accused of breaking the law. Just another example of it's good to be the king.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment