• 1,002 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 1,002 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 1,004 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,404 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,409 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,411 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,414 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,414 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,415 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,417 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,417 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,421 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,421 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,422 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,424 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,425 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,428 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,429 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,429 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,431 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

What's the Difference between Maddoff and U.S. Social Security?

Coercion. Both depend, or in the case of Maddoff, depended, on being able to get new contributors into the scheme in order to pay off the previous contributors. The Social Security Administration has the power of the law to force new contributors into its scheme. Maddoff did not have the power of the law to force new contributors into his scheme, therefore, he has been accused of breaking the law. Just another example of it's good to be the king.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment