• 7 hours Could China's Coronavirus Outbreak Impact U.S. Stocks?
  • 15 hours Tesla Stock Continues To Soar
  • 1 day What New Economic Data Reveals About Gold's Trajectory
  • 2 days The Lucrative New Tech Hijacking Your Privacy
  • 3 days The Biggest Loser In The China-U.S. Tariff Tit-For-Tat
  • 3 days Trade War Takes Its Toll On Shipping
  • 6 days Is $90 Oil Possible? An Interview With Jay Park
  • 6 days Billions Of Dollars Are Flooding Into The Flying Taxi Space
  • 7 days Is This The Most Important Energy Project Of 2020?
  • 7 days Startups Are Dying To Give You A Better Death
  • 8 days U.S. Restaurants Are Struggling With Rising Labor Costs
  • 8 days The Banking Bonanza Is Just Getting Started
  • 9 days How The Trade War Ceasefire Will Impact The Energy Industry
  • 9 days Who Is The Most Dangerous Person On The Internet?
  • 10 days SoftBank Sees First Quarterly Loss In 14 Years
  • 12 days Prepare For An Oil Glut In 2020
  • 12 days Why A Strong Yuan Is A Promising Sign For The Trade War
  • 13 days What Would You Sacrifice For A Debt-Free Life?
  • 14 days Shareholders Urge Major Bank To Stop Funding Fossil Fuel Companies
  • 14 days Tariffs Are Causing A Slowdown In U.S. Manufacturing
Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

This aging bull market may…

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

An economic slowdown in many…

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Forever 21 filed for Chapter…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

State of Fear

Network News has shifted gear the past few days. No longer should we worry about Bernanke/Geithner/Obama destroying the last vestiges of capitalism, we should worry about contacting the Mexican Swine Flu.

I don't want to diminish the possibility of it turning pandemic (my grandmother died from the 1918 influenza epidemic), but I do have a great deal of difficulty with both the timing of the news, and the voracity of the news networks in disseminating the news. Also problematic is every "talking head" bureaucrat from here to kingdom come telling us they have everything under control. It's very reminiscent of Bernanke telling us in the early stages of the credit crisis that "everything was under control" and the cost would be $50 million, oops $50 billion, oops ...

This morning's Drudge Report front page is a proxy for the aggressiveness of "Network News."

The timing of the switch from "fear in the financial markets" news to "fear of a pandemic" news is interesting.

Let's go back to the possible Sars pandemic in late 2002. This from Wikipedia:

The first clue of the outbreak appears to be 27 November 2002 when Canada's Global Public Health Intelligence Network (GPHIN), an electronic warning system which is part of the World Health Organization's (WHO) Global Outbreak and Alert Response Network (GOARN), picked up reports of a "flu outbreak" in China through internet media ...

The epidemic reached the public spotlight in February 2003, when an American businessman traveling from China became afflicted with pneumonia-like symptoms while on a flight to Singapore ...

I can only speculate why the media ignored Sars during December 2002 and January 2003, but the following chart shows the stock market bottoming during that time period from the 2000-2002 bear market.

The Mexican Swine Flu news does differ from Sars in that it seems fresh; this time the Networks didn't wait a couple of months before starting their campaign of fear.

But here we go again. With the bear market bottom a couple of months behind us, news about the demise of investments must be boring for the networks sothey've switched to another pandemic.

We should all be concerned about the possibility of serious flu, but put the "talking heads" on mute, and do your own research. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has lots of factual information.


Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment