• 658 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 659 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 661 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,060 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,065 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,067 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,070 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,070 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,071 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,073 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,073 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,077 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,077 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,078 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,080 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,081 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,084 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,085 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,085 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,087 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Extension of Post Coppock Curve Buy Signal Patterns

This is an extension of my June 27, 2003 communication:

The extension consists of charting the second 250 trading days after each signal rather than the first 250 trading days.




The various pattern pairs have now dissipated to the extent that they are hard to recognize this long after their respective Coppock Curve buy signals.

Still, line charts of the two relevant coordinates shown in my February 24, 2004 and April 24, 2004 communications suggest that the pattern pairs persist.

However, post-signal evidence obtained via a different model, and presented in my June 1, 2004 communication, indicates that all post-signal patterns are somewhat alike anyway, implying that the search for pattern pairs becomes more difficult the farther beyond in time the end dates of any patterns lie from their respective signal dates.

Nevertheless, for curiosity's sake, I will continue to update.

PS: Note that I now use 8/31/82 as a buy signal date, rather than 9/30/82 which I erroneously used heretofore.

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment