• 1,129 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 1,129 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 1,131 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,531 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,536 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,538 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,541 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,541 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,542 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,544 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,544 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,548 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,548 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,549 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,551 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,552 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,555 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,556 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,556 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,558 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Masses of Worthless Paper

We wince at congressional ineptitude but in one category legislative aptitude is improving: propaganda. The on-again, off-again finance bill (it's on-again) was described by the Wall Street Journal as "the most extensive remapping of financial regulation since the 1930s." It is nothing of the kind.

Where to open a critique is as much a problem as where to close it. So, this will start and end at the source: the Federal Reserve. In a single sentence, the Journal captured the most compelling reason to heave the proposed legislation into the BP oil spill: "The Federal Reserve would emerge as the pre-eminent regulator, with responsibility for the most complex financial companies."

The Federal Reserve has less understanding of banking than Bonnie and Clyde. Fed Chairman Ben S. Bernanke is unable to comprehend there was cause-and-effect between the boom the 1920s and the Great Depression of the 1930s. His ineptitude gave then-Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan the academic cover to reduce the fed funds rate to one percent in 2003. The most egregious credit bubble in the history of the world followed. Learning nothing, Simple Ben has now cut the funds rate to zero, creating an even greater credit bubble than the behemoth that collapsed in 2007.

Bernanke and his cohorts have no excuse for their ignorance. Federal Reserve policy in the 1920s was central to the credit write-offs that sank bank balance sheets later. This story was chronicled by dozens of economists in the 1930s. Their contribution is resurrected in "Masses of Worthless Paper," now posted on the AuContrarian.com website, in the "Articles" section. This was originally written for the May, 2010, Gloom, Boom, and Doom Report.

It is too late to escape the consequences of what Greenspan and Bernanke have done. But, there is no excuse for allowing the ruin to continue inflating. Chairman Bernanke keeps adding fuel to the conflagration. He should be handed a one-way ticket on a coal car to Princeton this afternoon.

Frederick Sheehan writes a blog at www.aucontrarian.com

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment