• 9 hours U.S. Moves To Bar Iranians From Investor Visas
  • 2 days Why Germany Is Going To War With Gold
  • 3 days Gold Is Still Cheap Compared To Stocks
  • 3 days Are Cryptocurrencies Funding Terrorism?
  • 4 days Promising Oil Companies To Watch In 2020
  • 4 days Could China's Coronavirus Outbreak Impact U.S. Stocks?
  • 5 days Tesla Stock Continues To Soar
  • 6 days What New Economic Data Reveals About Gold's Trajectory
  • 6 days The Lucrative New Tech Hijacking Your Privacy
  • 7 days The Biggest Loser In The China-U.S. Tariff Tit-For-Tat
  • 7 days Trade War Takes Its Toll On Shipping
  • 10 days Is $90 Oil Possible? An Interview With Jay Park
  • 10 days Billions Of Dollars Are Flooding Into The Flying Taxi Space
  • 11 days Is This The Most Important Energy Project Of 2020?
  • 11 days Startups Are Dying To Give You A Better Death
  • 12 days U.S. Restaurants Are Struggling With Rising Labor Costs
  • 12 days The Banking Bonanza Is Just Getting Started
  • 13 days How The Trade War Ceasefire Will Impact The Energy Industry
  • 13 days Who Is The Most Dangerous Person On The Internet?
  • 14 days SoftBank Sees First Quarterly Loss In 14 Years
Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

This aging bull market may…

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Forever 21 filed for Chapter…

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

An economic slowdown in many…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

If it Bleeds it Leads

As a general rule, the most successful man in life is the man who has the best information

What is happening in Japan is a humanitarian disaster, but not because of what primetime pundits and talking heads would have you believe.

"Nuclear Nightmare: A radioactive death cloud from one or more of the Japanese reactors experience core meltdown and catastrophic release of radiation could ..."


Japan Does Not Face Another Chernobyl

The containment structures appear to be working, and the latest reactor designs aren't vulnerable to the coolant problem at issue here.

William Tucker

www.terrestrialenergy.org

Even while thousands of people are reported dead or missing, whole neighborhoods lie in ruins, and gas and oil fires rage out of control, press coverage of the Japanese earthquake has quickly settled on the troubles at two nuclear reactors as the center of the catastrophe.

Rep. Ed Markey (D., Mass.), a longtime opponent of nuclear power, has warned of "another Chernobyl" and predicted "the same thing could happen here." In response, he has called for an immediate suspension of licensing procedures for the Westinghouse AP1000, a "Generation III" reactor that has been laboring through design review at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for seven years.

Before we respond with such panic, though, it would be useful to review exactly what is happening in Japan and what we have to fear from it.

The core of a nuclear reactor operates at about 550 degrees Fahrenheit, well below the temperature of a coal furnace and only slightly hotter than a kitchen oven. If anything unusual occurs, the control rods immediately drop, shutting off the nuclear reaction. You can't have a "runaway reactor," nor can a reactor explode like a nuclear bomb. A commercial reactor is to a bomb what Vaseline is to napalm. Although both are made from petroleum jelly, only one of them has potentially explosive material.

Once the reactor has shut down, there remains "decay heat" from traces of other radioactive isotopes. This can take more than a week to cool down, and the rods must be continually bathed in cooling waters to keep them from overheating.

On all Generation II reactors -- the ones currently in operation -- the cooling water is circulated by electric pumps. The new Generation III reactors such as the AP1000 have a simplified "passive" cooling system where the water circulates by natural convection with no pumping required.

If the pumps are knocked out in a Generation II reactor -- as they were at Fukushima Daiichi by the tsunami -- the water in the cooling system can overheat and evaporate. The resulting steam increases internal pressure that must be vented. There was a small release of radioactive steam at Three Mile Island in 1979, and there have also been a few releases at Fukushima Daiichi. These produce radiation at about the level of one dental X-ray in the immediate vicinity and quickly dissipate.

If the coolant continues to evaporate, the water level can fall below the level of the fuel rods, exposing them. This will cause a meltdown, meaning the fuel rods melt to the bottom of the steel pressure vessel.

Early speculation was that in a case like this the fuel might continue melting right through the steel and perhaps even through the concrete containment structure -- the so-called China syndrome, where the fuel would melt all the way to China. But Three Mile Island proved this doesn't happen. The melted fuel rods simply aren't hot enough to melt steel or concrete.

The decay heat must still be absorbed, however, and as a last-ditch effort the emergency core cooling system can be activated to flood the entire containment structure with water. This will do considerable damage to the reactor but will prevent any further steam releases. The Japanese have now reportedly done this using seawater in at least two of the troubled reactors. These reactors will never be restarted.

None of this amounts to "another Chernobyl." The Chernobyl reactor had two crucial design flaws. First, it used graphite (carbon) instead of water to "moderate" the neutrons, which makes possible the nuclear reaction. The graphite caught fire in April 1986 and burned for four days. Water does not catch fire.

Second, Chernobyl had no containment structure. When the graphite caught fire, it spouted a plume of radioactive smoke that spread across the globe. A containment structure would have both smothered the fire and contained the radioactivity.

If a meltdown does occur in Japan, it will be a disaster for the Tokyo Electric Power Company but not for the general public. Whatever steam releases occur will have a negligible impact. Researchers have spent 30 years trying to find health effects from the steam releases at Three Mile Island and have come up with nothing. With all the death, devastation and disease now threatening tens of thousands in Japan, it is trivializing and almost obscene to spend so much time worrying about damage to a nuclear reactor.

What the Japanese earthquake has proved is that even the oldest containment structures can withstand the impact of one of the largest earthquakes in recorded history. The problem has been with the electrical pumps required to operate the cooling system. It would be tragic if the result of the Japanese accident were to prevent development of Generation III reactors, which eliminate this design flaw.

Mr. Tucker is author of "Terrestrial Energy: How Nuclear Power Will Lead the Green Revolution and End America's Energy Odyssey" (Bartleby Press, 2010).


Japan nuclear crisis: Fukushima 'meltdown' is worrying, but this is no Chernobyl

By Tom Chivers
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/author/tomchiversscience/

"So by all means build future nuclear power stations in Japan to withstand greater earthquakes. But don't think this means that nuclear power is unsafe. And, most importantly, don't let the very human fear of the words "radiation", "nuclear", "meltdown" and "Chernobyl" distract us from the real tragedy, which is an unfolding humanitarian disaster of entirely natural and familiar causes. The real problem over the next few days is not going to be radiation sickness. It's going to be hypothermia. Fukushima is a high-profile diversion. Snow is the silent killer."

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment