• 519 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 519 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 521 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 921 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 926 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 928 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 931 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 931 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 932 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 934 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 934 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 938 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 938 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 939 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 941 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 942 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 945 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 946 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 946 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 948 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Another Bubble that Breaks the World?

In 1931 a financial writer named Garet Garrett wrote the now classic book, "A Bubble That Broke the World." Garrett's contention was that the Great Crash of 1929 was made possible by the Federal Reserve's monetary policy. Eighty years later another Fed-induced crisis is forming which, if allowed to continue, threatens to again break the back of the U.S. economy.

Before we get to that let's take a look at some current trends. The dominant theme for stocks and commodities has been the continuation of the Fed's QE2 program. QE2, which is the Fed's way of increasing liquidity, has been a tremendous success for both stock and commodity investors and there's no question the stock market likes the Fed's quantitative easing program.

During the credit crisis the old Wall Street bromide, "Don't fight the Fed," was called into question. But in light of the market's strong performance since the Fed commenced its Treasury buying program there can be no doubting that when the interim trend for stock prices is up, fighting the Fed isn't a winning strategy.

QE2 hasn't been without its problems, however. Commodity prices have risen disproportionately to the relatively low level of domestic demand. Demand alone doesn't account for the big run-up in the oil price, for instance, but there is ample reason for believing QE2 is behind the run-up in oil above $100/barrel. The oil price spike, should it continue, threatens to undo the Fed's work toward economic recovery over the last three years.

When Fed Chairman Bernanke first began the quantitative easing program after the credit crisis, his nominal concern was the below-normal level of inflation (read deflation). But at this point he faces the very real prospect of continuously increasing food and fuel prices, which in turn could imperil the economic recovery.

Nearly everyone can see this problem developing...everyone, that is, but Bernanke. When questioned about the possibility that QE2 could spark another commodities bubble, the Fed chairman responded that the currently low level of domestic demand would likely prevent this from happening. He emphasized that bringing down the high unemployment rate was the Fed's primary concern. The cost of food and fuel is getting higher, however, and has already led to a dramatic increase in many categories of goods and services.

In the latest edition of his Real Estate Timing Letter [www.RealEstateTiming.com], Robert Campbell asks, "If we double-dip into recession, what can the Fed do?" He suggests: "If soaring oil prices do cause the U.S. economy to double-dip back into recession, the Federal Reserve Board could find itself between a rock and a hard place as to what to do to resuscitate the economy and re-stimulate a recovery."

Campbell pointed out that in nine out of the last nine recessions since WWII the Fed was able to pave the way for economic recovery by dramatically lowering the fed funds rate to encourage lending. This time, Campbell continues, the Fed no longer has that option since the fed funds rate is already at zero. "Houston," he writes, "we have a problem - a big problem."

Fed Reserve Chart

Many observers are asking what the Fed could do if the high oil price threatens to take the economy back into recession. Atlanta Fed President Dennis Lockhart has suggested that one solution would be a new round of asset purchases, or QE3.

"Of course," writes Campbell, "many market watchers feel that one of the reasons that oil prices are going up is because of the massive injections of liquidity the Fed has forced into the system by way of Treasury purchases. This process is known as quantitative easing - or QE1 and QE2 - because they were the first and second round of such purchases. Since then, economic growth has picked up, but it seems likely that a lot (or maybe most) of these massive doses of liquidity have flowed into stocks, oil and commodities - which would explain some of the huge price increases that have occurred in the last 12 months."

Campbell concludes that "if the Fed were to respond to rising oil prices by engaging in even more quantitative easing, it could backfire and cause oil prices to go even higher - and thus worsening an economic downturn."

The recent surge in the crude oil price has raised the specter of $4.00/gallon gasoline. When the national gas price average topped $4.00/gallon in the summer of 2008 it broke the back of a consumer already weakened by the housing price collapse. The economy and financial market situation is arguably in better shape than it was three years ago but does anyone really believe the consumer is in a strong enough shape to absorb another spike in fuel prices?

Gas Chart

As we pointed out in a previous commentary, in the last 40 years, year-over-year rises in oil prices of 80% or more have always been followed by recession. No matter which way Mr. Bernanke turns, it seems he's confronted with some rather ugly scenarios. And another potentially "world breaking" oil price bubble should be the chief of his worries.

Bernanke Cartoon


Gold

Gold is about to test an important and long held theory, namely that the yellow metal is a "crisis hedge." The front cover of two of the leading mainstream magazines last week bore adequate testimony to the crisis at hand: the Japanese earthquake and its aftermath. The front cover of Businessweek said it succinctly: "Crisis in Japan." As if to further underscore the widespread feeling of anxiety over the latest global problems, the cover of the latest issue of Newsweek magazine says it even better:

Newsweek Cover

When we think of crisis in connection with gold, most people think in terms of financial crisis, such as a stock market crash or banking crisis. But what about natural disasters that afflict major regions of important countries? Are such episodes bullish for the gold price? One of the most recent natural disasters to afflict a country of major import was Hurricane Katrina back in 2005. Katrina was one of the five deadliest hurricanes in U.S. history and it devastated New Orleans and parts of the Gulf Coast, inflicting over $90 billion in damage. The hurricane was a financial setback for the federal government and it was followed by a correction in the stock market. It proved to be a turning point for the gold price, however.

Although the gold price, like other asset categories, was briefly sold off when Katrina hit in late August of 2005, it quickly recovered and went on to new highs. Unlike the stock market, gold was a beneficiary of post-Katrina crisis investors who were seeking a safe haven. It should again benefit from the latest crisis.


Moving Averages

With the return of volatility in 2011, it's important for traders to have a sound trading discipline. Classical trend line methods can be useful but they aren't particularly suited for a fast-moving, dynamic market environment. This is especially true where turning points occur rapidly in a market that is subject to cyclical crosscurrents as has been true in the year to date. That's where moving averages come in handy.

With a good moving average system a trader can be reasonably assured of catching most of the important moves in an actively traded stock or ETF while eliminating many of the whipsaws that attend trading choppy markets. In the book "Stock Trading with Moving Averages" we discuss some market-tested methods that have proven successful across most major stock sectors and industry groups, and is especially geared toward the gold and silver mining stocks and ETFs. Here's what one reader had to say about the book: "...you were the one who supercharged my charting with your moving average book 'Stock Trading with Moving Averages' and your constant analysis of the double and triple moving average series."

 


Moving averages offer another advantage over trend lines in that they can be tailored to closely fit the dominant short-term and interim market cycles. They're also more compatible with a trading range-type market...if you use the right moving average system. These and other strategies and tactics are discussed in "Stock Trading with Moving Averages." Order your copy today and receive as an added bonus my latest mini-book on how to best use moving averages for riding longer-term trades. Click here for ordering info.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment