• 967 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 968 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 970 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,369 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,374 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,376 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,379 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,379 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,380 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,382 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,382 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,386 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,386 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,387 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,389 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,390 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,393 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,394 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,394 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,396 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Eyes Wide Open

As a geologist, I can appreciate the fundamental underpinnings that make up the energy and metal components of the CRB Index. The arcs of exploration, field-development and resource quality.

For the most part, there is a neat set of equations and analytics that can elegantly distill where the resources can likely be found, how much they will roughly cost to get out of the ground and what quality they will be once they are exploited.

The variable has always been how much the market will yield for these assets - and there is absolutely no mathematical formula that can explain the market's rationale for valuing a commodity one week at X and the next week at X(.70) (yes - that is last weeks formula for silver). The efficient market theorists can keep their tin foil hats on as a fashion statement, but once you fold human emotion into the formula - all bets are off.

Figure 1

It is why causation is typically such a fools game when painting the fundamental picture of an asset class (broadly speaking, i.e equity, bonds and commodities). A white paper's methodology of explaining the fundamental virtues of a certain market (not relevant to individual stocks) is often times overly verbose and irrelevant to price. Certainly there are times in the cycle where fundamental analysis is more than helpful with establishing ones position in the market. But for the vast part of the price continuum, its a diminishing angle of relevance.

As a trader and investor - you absolutely need to throw another axis down and establish the technical picture. Without it, your viewpoint is basically a monoscopic reference, rather than a three-dimensional perspective. You are essentially limited to one eye without peripheral vision.

What is interesting about many money managers today is that they started their careers in the benevolent boom times of the late1980's and 1990's. The fundamental story worked for their respective investing thesis' more out of luck in the cycle (i.e Malcom Gladwell's Outliers) than prescience.

The fundamental perspective just became the easiest pill to swallow and present to investors.

 


I just joined Twitter. All my trades and occasional market musings are disclosed in real-time here.

(Position in AGQ, UUP)

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment