• 526 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 526 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 528 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 928 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 933 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 935 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 938 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 938 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 939 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 941 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 941 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 945 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 945 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 946 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 948 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 949 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 952 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 953 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 953 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 955 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

The Abuse of Dow Theory

Below is a commentary posted at the Dow Theory Project Blog on 17th October 2004.

I see a stepped up abuse of Dow Theory over the last few months that is rather worrisome in our internet age. I am concerned about a group that is emerging out of Richard Russell's shadow that is both uninformed and undisciplined. I am not going to name names, because for the most part, we are talking only about the last few months and about a group of people who do not reach any significant amount of people. My concern is that some of these prognosticators are selling good candy. Remember, candy may taste good in the short term, but in the long run, it will rot your teeth.

With so many questioning Dow Theory's modern day validity, shouldn't we allow it to rise or fall on its own merits, rather than be undermined by the apologists trying to make it fit their own predetermined outcomes?

What I have been reading of late is a lazy bending of Dow Theory to meet the writers own desired conclusion. In another case, a writer (No, I am not talking about Tim Wood here), frustrated by the current seven month divergence, combined Dow Theory with Elliot Wave Theory to draw a conclusion that would not work if either theory were used individually for the same problem. As the "Self Appointed" protector of Dow Theory heading into the next 50 years, I must defend the very theory which has been confounding all during the difficult last seven months. Dow Theory is open to interpretation and it is public domain. Dow Theory is sometimes fallible, but Bad Dow Theory is 100% fallible.

The emergence of these neophyte "Dow Theorist's" is inevitable coming out of the shadows of Richard Russell's success. He is nearly 50 years its student and teacher, having lived through his own terrible calls and remained humble with his long list of top-notch calls. Richard, for his part, has favored a free market approach to the emergence of the next great Dow Theorist, having never taken an apprentice or reached out to other Dow Theorists in an effort to ensure consistency. The advent of the internet and current explosion of Blogs that can be up in ten minutes and populated with opinions on Dow Theory almost as fast are threatening the quality of Dow Theory information. Could the internet be responsible for creating a homogenized group of Monday morning theorists who seek to apply Brand "X" Dow Theory to meet their predetermined conclusions?

I sound like the "Church Lady" here, and that's ok, because Dow Theory is Special. A living theory that has stood where other theories have fell. The Grandfather of all technical analysis, which to this day, kicks-ass against all the new whippersnappers with their magic investment spiel.

Long before Value minded Benjamin Graham came along with his "Intelligent Investor", Charles Dow, William Peter Hamilton and Robert Rhea had synergistically created the best Value Investing process that ever existed. A way to create wealth in the stock market that when followed properly exposed investors to buying opportunities few will ever see in a lifetime of equity investing.

Bio's for Dow, Hamilton, Rhea, Schaefer, and Russell can be found @ The Dow Theory Project

Ok, now that I have that off my chest I can fast forward to today's interesting market condition.

The Rest of The Weekend Barometer for Oct 17, 2004 can be read @ The Dow Theory Project

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment