• 521 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 521 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 523 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 923 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 928 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 930 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 933 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 933 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 934 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 936 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 936 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 940 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 940 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 941 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 943 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 944 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 947 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 948 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 948 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 950 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Still ARMed

We share the belief that the U.S. is in a mortgage-finance/house-price bubble. A common concern, now getting renewed attention, is that increasing numbers of people have turned to Adjustable Rate Mortgages (ARMs) at a time when these rates, recently at 40-year lows, have nowhere to go but up.

ARM rates track T-bill rates and the Fed Funds Rate (FFR). Some pundits believed these borrowers would quickly be impaired as ARM rates rose in line with the Fed's repeated raising of the FFR in recent months. Well, the Fed has raised the FFR five times in the last six months, from 1.0% to 2.25%, but ARM rates have not responded in kind. Here's why.

The chart below is a 20 year history of ARM rates (as collected by the Freddie Mac survey) and T-bill rates, with markers indicating periods of Fed easing and Fed tightening.

The chart shows that during periods of Fed easing, the spread between T-bills and ARMs widened because ARMs did not follow T-bills down, point for point. Conversely, as the Fed tightened, the spread narrowed until T-bill rates rose to within about 1.0% of ARM rates. Thereafter, the rates rose point-for-point.

Thus, history suggests that ARM rates will not begin rising point-for-point with the T-bill/FFR rates until the spread between them is cut to, perhaps, one percent, requiring T-bill rates to rise from today's 2.25% to 3.5% - 4.0% before this kicks in. The question is, when might that happen?

A Barron's poll of 12 economists ("Current Yield," 12/13/2004) showed their average FFR year-end 2005 forecast to be 3.4% - we'll use 3.5% here. If the Fed maintains its "measured" pace in hiking rates, a year-end 2005 rate of 3.5% could prove close to the mark. And, if historical precedent on narrowing the spread again holds true, ARM rates might drift only slightly higher by year-end.

It, therefore, seems that ARM borrowers will be ARMed until T-bill/FFR rates get to, or through, 3.5%, at which time, these rates will begin moving point-for-point.

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment