• 519 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 519 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 521 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 920 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 925 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 927 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 930 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 930 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 931 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 933 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 933 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 937 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 938 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 938 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 941 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 941 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 944 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 945 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 945 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 947 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
Ian Campbell

Ian Campbell

Through his www.BusinessTransitionSimplified.com website and his Business Transition & Valuation Review newsletter Ian R. Campbell shares his perspectives on business transition, business valuation and world…

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

The Consequences of Contagion?

Why read: Because if you think about it, this can be argued to offer a suggestion (and a warning) of how much at risk the so-called 'systemic country economies' currently are.

Commentary: The International Monetary Fund has, in a report titled 2012 Spillover Report, attempted to quantify potential world effects that may arise from economic difficulties faced by China, the Eurozone, Japan, the United Kingdom and the United States. These countries are referred to as the five 'systemic economies'. I have taken 'systemic' to mean the 'most cross-linked', and hence those most susceptible to 'contagion' if one or more serious economic events or problems arises going forward.

The IMF seems to think that if the European Union authorities don't 'act in time', Eurozone growth will be negatively impacted by 5%, the U.S. growth by about 2%, and growth for the other three by between 0.5% - 2.5%. That leads, or so I think, to the following important questions:

  • what does 'act in time' mean in the context of elapsed time? Weeks, months, or years - or, perish the thought, has 'act in time' come and gone already?; and,

  • how credible are the IMF assumed results? What precisely did the IMF account for? How have they specifically integrated 'derivatives issues', when no one seems to know the U.S.$ value of aggregate outstanding derivatives? And so on?

Intuitively, I suspect the IMF's conclusions are 'inadequate on the low side' if there ever proves to be serious contagion issues. I also think that politicians in the Eurozone and America have both 'left it too long', in circumstances where I believe more quantitative easing - if and when it comes - will be nothing more than a band-aid stuck on the wound created by a leg amputation.

You can link to the IMF 'spillover report' through the referenced article, and read it for yourself. Dated July 9, 2012, it is a 20 page report that strikes me as 'more than a little' academic in its approach to what has to be an extraordinarily difficult thing to analyze.

Topical Reference: How Bad Could EU Crisis Get? IMF Attempts an Answer, from The Wall Street Journal, Real Time Economics, Ian Talley, August 6, 2012 - reading time 2 minutes.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment