• 407 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 408 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 409 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 809 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 814 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 816 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 819 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 819 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 820 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 822 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 822 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 826 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 826 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 827 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 829 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 830 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 833 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 834 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 834 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 836 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Forever 21 filed for Chapter…

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

This aging bull market may…

Ian Campbell

Ian Campbell

Through his www.BusinessTransitionSimplified.com website and his Business Transition & Valuation Review newsletter Ian R. Campbell shares his perspectives on business transition, business valuation and world…

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

How Negative Might U.S. QE3 Announced September 13 Really Be?

In a must-read and think-about article Liam Halligan, Chief Economist at Prosperity Capital Management, expresses his views on the U.S. quantitative easing measures introduced on Friday by Fed Chair Bernanke saying that in his view:

  • they will do more harm than good;

  • will do more harm than good to the U.S. credit rating;

  • harm American consumers as it will fuel future inflation;

  • potentially spark a trade war; and,

  • result in increased reluctance on the part of China and others to keep buying U.S. treasuries.

If he is right or even partially right, the financial markets last Friday (September 14) likely over-reacted on the positive side. If you participate in those markets I suggest you read this well constructed article - and conclude what parts of it you agree and disagree with.

You might want to consider whether it is significant that it has been reported that Egan-Jones Ratings Co. on Friday downgraded its U.S. sovereign rating to AA- from AA+. From its website, Egan-Jones Ratings describes itself as an independent Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization (NRSRO) not paid by corporations issuing bonds. It seems to me the question that arises from this is: What adjustments Fitch, Moody's and Standard & Poor's will make, if any, to the U.S. credit rating going forward.

Topical Reference: US cannot continue the endless sugar rush, from The Telegraph, Liam Halligan, September 15, 2012 - reading time 5 minutes, thinking time longer. Also see Egan-Jones downgrades U.S. rating on QE3 move, from Marketwatch, Wallace Witkowski, September 14, 2012 - reading time 1 minute.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment