• 403 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 404 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 405 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 805 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 810 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 812 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 815 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 815 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 816 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 818 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 818 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 822 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 822 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 823 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 825 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 826 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 829 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 830 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 830 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 832 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Some Comments on the "Birth/Death" Controversy Surrounding U.S. Employment Data

Last Wednesday (5/11) I received an e-mail from a client regarding a Morgan Stanley research article he had just read. The piece was entitled, "'Birth/Death' Confusion Redux." It was authored by Ted Wieseman and appeared in Morgan Stanley's regular publication, "Global Economic Forum" (edition of May 11th).

In his article, Mr. Wieseman was a bit critical of those who think there might be a problem (or even two) with the so-called "Birth/Death" adjustments the US Labor Department uses in computing its monthly payroll employment numbers. To wit:

"Spring is in the air, which in addition to warmer weather now seems to mean conspiracy theories running amok about the Bureau of Labor Statistics' 'birth/death' adjustment to the monthly payroll figures...."

While the client who sent me the e-mail knows we are not part of the "black helicopter" crowd, he also knows that from time to time, we have expressed a least a modicum of skepticism about the US employment numbers, and more specifically, about the methodology used in computing them. Thus, he wondered if we might have some thoughts about Mr. Wieseman's article.

I forwarded the request to my friend and associate, John Williams. I believe John's response will be of genuine interest to anyone who has had questions or concerns (conspiratorial or other) about the DOL's "Birth/Death" adjustments. http://www.gillespieresearch.com/cgi-bin/s/article/id=556

 

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment