• 526 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 526 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 528 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 928 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 932 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 934 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 937 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 938 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 939 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 940 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 941 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 945 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 945 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 946 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 948 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 948 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 952 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 952 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 953 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 955 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Technical Market Report for October 11, 2014

The good news is:
• This period of weakness should end soon.


The negatives

Several years ago a reporter asked a Fed governor (I think it might have been Donald Kohn) if he thought QE had been successful. The Fed governor replied that it (QE) had been successful because the dollar was down and the stock market up. This statement was revealing because it was an explicit admission that, among QE objectives, were manipulation of the equity and forex markets.

The chart below, using FastTrack data, covers the past year showing the S&P 500 in red and the dollar index in green plotted on log scales. Correlation over the previous 21 trading days is shown in black. Dashed vertical lines have been drawn on the 1st trading day of each month. Dashed horizontal lines have been drawn at 25% increments of the correlation indicator.

The Fed has been tapering QE since last spring and the effect is becoming noticeable, the dollar is up and the stock market is down. I wonder when they will panic and announce the next round of QE.

Last week new lows remained at threatening levels every day and finished the week at the highest levels seen since March of 2009.

It will be easy to tell when this decline is over because new lows will disappear and by that I mean decline to less than 40 on the NYSE and less than 70 on the NASDAQ for at least 5 consecutive days.

The chart below covers the past year showing the S&P 500 (SPX) in red and a 10% trend (19 day EMA) of NYSE new lows (NY NL) in blue. NY NL has been plotted on an inverted Y axis so decreasing new lows move the indicator upward (up is good).

NY NL continued its sharp decline last week.

NY NL

The next chart is similar to the first one except it shows the NASDAQ composite (OTC) in blue and OTC NL, in red, has been calculated from NASDAQ data.

The pattern of OTC NL is similar to NY NL.

OTC NL

At this point new lows are all that matter.


The positives

It has been many years since the Fed has allowed a bear market to play itself out. I expect Fed intervention if the form of another round of QE before this one plays itself out.


Seasonality

Next week includes the 5 trading days prior to the 3rd Friday of October during the 2nd year of the Presidential Cycle.

The tables below show the change, on a percentage basis, of the OTC and SPX for the 5 trading days prior to the 3rd Friday of October during the 2nd year of the Presidential Cycle.

OTC data covers the period from 1963 to 2013 while SPX data runs from 1953 through 2013. There are summaries for both the 2nd year of the Presidential Cycle and all years combined. Prior to 1953 the market traded 6 days a week so that data has been ignored.

Average returns for next week have been positive by all measures and stronger during the 2nd year of the Presidential Cycle.

Report for the week before the 3rd Friday of October.
The number following the year is its position in the Presidential Cycle.
Daily returns from Monday through 3rd Friday.

OTC Presidential Year 2
Year Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Totals
1966-2 -0.02% 0.77% 1.80% -1.12% -0.21% 1.22%
1970-2 -0.66% -0.85% -0.56% 0.19% 0.39% -1.50%
 
1974-2 2.17% -0.53% -0.34% 1.39% 1.14% 3.83%
1978-2 -1.21% -2.22% -1.56% -1.32% -2.67% -8.98%
1982-2 1.72% -0.07% 1.49% -0.16% -0.19% 2.79%
1986-2 0.15% -0.08% 0.53% 0.20% -0.18% 0.62%
1990-2 0.61% -1.24% 0.41% 2.22% 1.00% 2.99%
Avg 0.69% -0.83% 0.11% 0.47% -0.18% 0.25%
 
1994-2 -0.17% -0.13% 0.76% -0.31% -0.37% -0.22%
1998-2 3.59% -2.37% 2.11% 4.52% 0.62% 8.47%
2002-2 0.83% 5.07% -3.90% 3.24% 1.22% 6.46%
2006-2 0.28% -0.80% -0.33% 0.16% 0.06% -0.63%
2010-2 0.02% 0.65% 0.96% -0.24% 1.37% 2.76%
Avg 0.91% 0.49% -0.08% 1.47% 0.58% 3.37%
 
OTC summary for Presidential Year 2 1966 - 2010
Avg 0.61% -0.15% 0.11% 0.73% 0.18% 1.48%
Win% 67% 25% 58% 58% 58% 67%
 
OTC summary for all years 1963 - 2013
Avg 0.39% -0.02% -0.23% 0.46% -0.14% 0.44%
Win% 62% 53% 50% 65% 55% 53%
 
SPX Presidential Year 2
Year Mon Tue Wed Thur Fri Totals
1954-2 -0.80% -0.40% -0.03% -1.21% -0.53% -2.97%
1958-2 0.45% -0.70% -1.33% 0.71% 1.02% 0.16%
1962-2 0.56% -0.33% -0.33% -0.97% -1.33% -2.40%
1966-2 1.14% 1.56% -0.80% -0.27% 0.45% 2.08%
1970-2 -1.07% -0.13% 0.15% 0.55% -0.44% -0.94%
Avg 0.06% 0.00% -0.47% -0.24% -0.17% -0.81%
 
1974-2 2.25% -1.79% -1.55% 1.19% 1.56% 1.66%
1978-2 -1.96% -1.32% -0.76% -1.15% -1.39% -6.58%
1982-2 2.61% -0.02% 1.69% -1.57% -0.74% 1.97%
1986-2 0.18% -0.23% 1.46% 0.31% -0.29% 1.43%
1990-2 1.07% -1.42% -0.05% 2.34% 2.20% 4.13%
Avg 0.83% -0.96% 0.16% 0.22% 0.27% 0.52%
 
1994-2 -0.03% -0.28% 0.56% -0.73% -0.42% -0.90%
1998-2 1.36% -0.29% 1.08% 4.18% 0.85% 7.17%
2002-2 0.73% 4.73% -2.41% 2.23% 0.59% 5.88%
2006-2 0.25% -0.37% 0.14% 0.07% 0.12% 0.22%
2010-2 0.01% 0.38% 0.71% -0.36% 0.20% 0.95%
Avg 0.47% 0.84% 0.02% 1.08% 0.27% 2.66%
 
SPX summary for Presidential Year 2 1954 - 2010
Avg 0.45% -0.04% -0.10% 0.35% 0.12% 0.79%
Win% 73% 20% 47% 53% 53% 67%
 
SPX summary for all years 1953 - 2013
Avg 0.43% 0.00% -0.25% 0.26% -0.18% 0.25%
Win% 65% 38% 48% 59% 48% 61%


Money Supply (M2)

The money supply chart was provided by Gordon Harms. M2 growth fell sharply last week.

M2 Money Supply and SPX Charts


Conclusion

There is no bottom in sight.

New lows are at their highest levels in nearly 6 years and climbing.

Without Fed intervention we are likely to see a real bear market, the first one in over a decade.

I expect the major averages to be lower on Friday October 17 than they were on Friday October 10.

Last weeks positive forecast was a miss.

This report is free to anyone who wants it, so please tell your friends. They can sign up at: http://www.stockmarket-ta.com/signup.html. If it is not for you, reply with REMOVE in the subject line.

These reports are archived at: http://www.safehaven.com/

Good Luck,

YTD W 12 / L 16 / T 13

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment