• 907 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 907 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 909 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,309 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,314 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,316 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,319 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,319 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,320 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,322 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,322 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,326 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,326 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,327 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,329 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,330 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,333 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,334 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,334 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,336 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Some Disturbing Action: Inflowing Liquidity Levels on The IWM (ETF for the Russell 2000)

Maybe it turns out okay, but when you look at the Inflowing Liquidity levels on the IWM (ETF for the Russell 2000), you will see some disturbing action.

What is disturbing can be seen on the red arrows displayed. Note that the first one showed a lower/high, and the second showed a lower/low.

What is wrong with that? It is the definition of a down trend, so unless it changes, there will be trouble ahead.

IWM Inflowing Liquidity Levels Chart

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment