• 1,015 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 1,015 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 1,017 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,417 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,422 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,424 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,427 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,427 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,428 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,430 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,430 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,434 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,434 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,435 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,437 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,438 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,441 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,442 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,442 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,444 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Some Disturbing Action: Inflowing Liquidity Levels on The IWM (ETF for the Russell 2000)

Maybe it turns out okay, but when you look at the Inflowing Liquidity levels on the IWM (ETF for the Russell 2000), you will see some disturbing action.

What is disturbing can be seen on the red arrows displayed. Note that the first one showed a lower/high, and the second showed a lower/low.

What is wrong with that? It is the definition of a down trend, so unless it changes, there will be trouble ahead.

IWM Inflowing Liquidity Levels Chart

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment