• 887 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 887 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 889 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,289 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,294 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,296 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,299 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,299 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,300 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,302 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,302 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,306 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,306 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,307 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,309 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,310 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,313 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,314 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,314 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,316 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

An economic slowdown in many…

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

More freeports open around the…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Going All-In On a Weak Argument

In Poker, to go all in means to bet everything you have. I do not think it is an exaggeration to say that, at least so far as the mainstream audience is concerned, we gold advocates have gone all in. We have made one argument: we should adopt the gold standard, because inflation. By inflation, it is generally meant rising consumer prices (this is not my definition), again at least so far as the mainstream audience goes.

It's true. Prices have been rising relentlessly since the Federal Reserve Act of 1913. We certainly have made the argument that inflation happens in paper money, but not in gold. I think most people believe that, despite the obfuscations of the diehard apologists for the Fed.

I think people care about inflation -- but not that much.

People who work for wages mostly get mad at their boss for not giving them a big enough raise. People who are retired on a pension mostly get mad at the politicians for the same reason. They complain that the cost of living adjustment is not enough.

What about the rich? This graph explains why the rich are not at all unhappy.

Stocks versus Consumer Price Index

Their stock portfolios are going up at a much faster rate than consumer prices. I have scaled the CPI curve to the same proportions as the S&P index. If consumer prices had gone up by 2.8X, as the S&P did, then the two curves would match.

Astute readers will note that I cherry picked the start of the graph at March 2009. That was quite deliberate, as I think stock investors have a pretty short memory, possibly not even that long.

If this is it, if the argument for the gold standard is merely that prices are rising, then the wealthy would prefer we stay on the dollar system. It's making them wealthier.

A few months ago, at the Shadow Open Market Committee meeting in New York, the keynote speaker put a sharp point on this. Richard Fisher, president of the Dallas Fed, was asked a question in front of a room where 99% of the people were in the 1% (the remainder were young, still working on getting that grant or planning to transition out of government and into an investment bank). The question was about the wealth effect.

"Yes," he said wryly, "the wealthy have been ... very affected."

We need to make other arguments about the failings of the dollar, and the virtues of gold.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment