• 11 hours Homeowners Experiment With Risky New Investment Trend
  • 14 hours U.S. Tech Stocks Look Increasingly Vulnerable
  • 17 hours De Beers To Expand World’s Most Profitable Diamond Mine
  • 19 hours Ford CEO Gets Raise After Massive Layoff Round
  • 1 day Germany’s Flirtation With Recession Could Cripple The Global Economy
  • 2 days Where To Look As Gold Miners Inch Higher
  • 2 days Google Faces Billions In Fines From European Regulators
  • 3 days The Energy Industry Has A Millennial Problem
  • 3 days Russian Banks Scramble For Sanction Loopholes
  • 4 days Gold ETFs Take A Hit After Four-Month Run
  • 4 days European Union Takes Aim At Ten New Tax Havens
  • 5 days Goldman Defends Trillion-Dollar Corporate Buyback Spree
  • 5 days $600 Billion At Risk As Boeing Fallout Continues
  • 5 days Venezuela Has Yet Another Crisis Developing
  • 5 days Wells Fargo Accused Of “Ongoing Lawlessness”
  • 6 days Hollywood Agency Returns $400M Investment To Saudi Wealth Fund
  • 6 days Why Twitter's CEO Is Backing A New Bitcoin Boom
  • 6 days U.S. Treasury To Employ “Extraordinary Measures” To Fend Off Default
  • 6 days Lobster, Golf Carts And Fidget Spinners: What’s In The Federal Budget?
  • 7 days Italy Launches New Welfare Experiment
Lending: The Good, Bad, And Ugly

Lending: The Good, Bad, And Ugly

Aristotle said, “The most hated…

The Chatroom Cartel Running Global Bond Markets

The Chatroom Cartel Running Global Bond Markets

Eight major banks have been…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

First Quarter GDP Likely Negative as Trade Deficit Soars

On April 29 in Real Q1 GDP 0.2% vs. Consensus 1.0%; Disaster in the Details I commented "The second estimate of Q1 GDP comes out on May 29. Any number of changes could send Q1 negative."

Here we are already. Imports subtract from GDP and March trade numbers were much worse than expected.

The Bloomberg Consensus trade estimate was -42.0 billion. The actual trade deficit was -51.4 billion. The deficit was outside the entire range of estimates of -45.0 billion to -37.8 billion.

First-quarter GDP, barely above zero at plus 0.2 percent, may move into the negative column on revision following a much higher-than-expected March trade deficit of $51.4 billion, the largest since October 2008. The unwinding of the port strike on the West Coast, which was resolved mid-month March, played a major role in the data especially evident in imports which surged $17.1 billion in the month as backlogs at the ports were cleared. Imports of consumer goods, especially cell phones, were especially heavy. Exports, led by aircraft, also rose but only $1.6 billion. The total goods gap in the month was $70.6 billion which is the highest since August 2008.

The gap in petroleum trade, at $7.7 billion vs February's $8.2 billion, wasn't a major factor in the March data as the drop in prices was offset by a rise in volumes. By country, the gap with China widened to $31.2 vs $22.5 billion in February and to $7.1 billion vs $4.2 billion for Japan. The OPEC gap widened slightly to $1.2 billion vs $0.7 billion.

Today's report offers stark evidence of how much the port strike really did impact the economy and was likely one of the major "transitory" factors, as the Fed puts it, that slowed down first-quarter growth. These effects are likely to unwind in the second quarter and become a footnote for first-quarter data.


Transitory Nonsense

Economists still cling to the notion this is transitory.

For my take, please see Fed Cites Weather, "Transitory" Factors in FOMC Statement; No Hat Tricks; What About Consumer Sentiment?


GDP Now

In light of the today's trade report the Atlanta Fed lowered its GDPNow Estimate for second quarter GDP to 0.8%.

Evolution of Altanta Fed GDPNow real GDP forecast for 2015: Q2

Note how economists still cling to optimism no matter how bad the economic numbers.

If the Atlanta Fed still modeled 1st quarter, I would now expect it to be negative.

On April 17, I commented Déjà Vu Weather? No, It's a Recession!

There's no need to change that forecast no matter what fantasies the blue-chip economists have for 3.5% growth.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment