• 20 hours Trump Was Right About The Dollar
  • 23 hours Is Silver Gearing Up For A Rally?
  • 1 day World’s Largest Hedge Fund Turns Bullish On Gold
  • 1 day It’s Time To Spend More On Clean Energy R&D
  • 2 days Contrarian Investors Are Beating The Stock Market
  • 2 days Bulgaria’s Revenue Agency Falls Victim To Biggest Cyber Heist In History
  • 2 days Amazon Faces European Union Anti-Trust Probe
  • 2 days Commodities Are Having A Stellar Year
  • 3 days Bezos’ Next Big Project Could Be Worth $100 Billion Per Year
  • 3 days 3,600 Years Later, Climate Change Turns Mammoths Into $40M Market
  • 3 days Tesla, Apple Claim China Is Stealing Intellectual Property
  • 3 days EV Giants Duke It Out For Battery Dominance
  • 4 days Tech Billionaire Takes Aim At Google
  • 4 days Chinese Police Bust Largest Ever Illicit Crypto Mining Operation
  • 4 days Expect A Pullback Before Gold's Next Major Rally
  • 4 days Why Interest On Gold Matters
  • 5 days Ten Extravagant Food Items For The Wealthy Only
  • 5 days Why Saudi Arabia Won't Give Up On The Aramco IPO
  • 6 days $32 Million Crypto Heist Halts Tokyo Exchange
  • 6 days Is A Gold Selloff Looming?
Market Sentiment At Its Lowest In 10 Months

Market Sentiment At Its Lowest In 10 Months

Stocks sold off last week…

The Problem With Modern Monetary Theory

The Problem With Modern Monetary Theory

Modern monetary theory has been…

Billionaires Are Pushing Art To New Limits

Billionaires Are Pushing Art To New Limits

Welcome to Art Basel: The…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Inane Analysis on 'Who Benefits from a Higher Minimum Wage'

Without any analysis or comment, Barry Ritholtz posted EPI propaganda on "Who Benefits from a Higher Minimum Wage".

Who benefits from a higher minimum wage?

Barry, if you are going to post such nonsense, at least comment on it.

I would like you to say how stupid such analysis is. That may be expecting too much.

But if you agree with it, at least say so. Say anything. If you have an opinion, what the hell is it? Here is mine.


  1. Those who receive a pay hike and keep their job


  1. Those who are not hired because they are not worth it.
  2. Those who would have been hired but won't be because fewer stores will open
  3. Small businesses who are forced to close because they cannot afford higher minimum wages
  4. Employees of small businesses that close because they cannot afford higher minimum wages
  5. Consumers, especially those on fixed income who have to pay more for goods because stores hike prices (which in turn causes the likes of the EPI to whine for still more hikes)
  6. Taxpayers who have to pay inane pension promises when unions demand reciprocal hikes
  7. Taxpayers who instead of paying the "Walmart Subsidy" that Ritholtz whines about, funds 100% of the benefits

The EPI (and I am 99% positive Ritholtz) only looks at the winners, and even then superficially. What about the losers?

Does the EPI care one iota? Ritholtz? I actually prefer to be wrong about Ritholtz.

Looking for an excellent example of points three and four? If so, please consider Capitalism for Me, Socialism for Thee; Progressive Capitalism?

If the agenda fits, the EPI ignores the problems and trumps up the benefits. Unthinking analysts follow right along.


Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment