• 312 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 313 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 314 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 714 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 719 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 721 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 724 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 724 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 725 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 727 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 727 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 731 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 731 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 732 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 734 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 735 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 738 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 739 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 739 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 741 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
Billionaires Are Pushing Art To New Limits

Billionaires Are Pushing Art To New Limits

Welcome to Art Basel: The…

Strong U.S. Dollar Weighs On Blue Chip Earnings

Strong U.S. Dollar Weighs On Blue Chip Earnings

Earnings season is well underway,…

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

More freeports open around the…

Prashant Trivedi

Prashant Trivedi

Multi-Act is a financial services provider operating an investment advisory business and an independent equity research services business based in Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Contact Author

Baijnath Ramraika

Baijnath Ramraika

Multi-Act is a financial services provider operating an investment advisory business and an independent equity research services business based in Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Are We in a Bull Market? Danger, Will Robinson, Danger!

This article first appeared on Advisor Perspectives.


The low-yield environment manufactured by central banks has encouraged and precipitated yield-seeking speculation. Investors and speculators alike have taken up a near-religious conviction in the demi-god status of central bankers. Will these central bankers continue to enjoy their god like status indefinitely or will they disappoint their followers?

In one of our earlier articles, US Equities: Overvalued or Undervalued, we surveyed the historical experience of valuation tools. In that article, we observed that the U.S. equity markets are priced for very low subsequent investment returns. This article adds to the historical experience by providing an overview of the potential risk that investors face, should we enter a bear market.

A market on steroids

Since the depth of the March 2009 bottom, the U.S. stock markets have more than trebled, having risen by about 215%[2] over a period of 75 months. Figure 1 shows the 75-month rate of change for the S&P500 Index for the last 140 years. The reason for using a 75-month rate of change is that the length of market's current move from its trough is 75 months. Clearly, the current rate of change is in extreme territory and is exceeded only by three other market up-moves: the roaring bull market of twenties leading into the Great Depression, the bull market of the fifties and the technology boom. Further, the trajectory of the up-move is similar to that of the market leading into the highs of 1929 and the highs in 1938[3].

We have had a market on potent steroids.

Figure 1

Sub-par economic growth

Interestingly, this strong performance of the U.S. equity markets has taken place while the broader economy hasn't really done all that well. Economic growth rates have been sub-par for much of this equity market rally. Table 1 shows the average real GDP growth rates experienced during the three market up moves discussed earlier where the rate of change exceeded that of the current market. For comparison,we have provided the GDP growth rates experienced thus far during this up move.

Table 1[4]

A bull market or a new market?

Naturally, this has prompted many astute market participants to raise questions about the sustainability of current price levels. John Hussman, Jeremy Grantham and others have pointed out the significant overvaluation of U.S. equities. On the other hand, many find the markets to be fairly valued based on a different set of valuation tools. The key point of contention between these two groups is the selection and application of valuation tools. However, there is a much more basic issue that investors have to contend with. As Benjamin Graham so eloquently put it, "The main issue before the investor may be expressed this way: Have we been in a bull market or in a new sort of market?[5]"

If we are in a bull market, we will indeed have a bear market following it. It is much like how night is inevitable after day. However, if you believe that we are in a new market where central bankers' superpower is sufficient to fend off any bearish inclinations without regard to valuations, then the valuation question is irrelevant. In such a case, the inevitability of the bear market doesn't hold.

Assuming we are in a bull market, it will pay to understand the kind of declines we could experience if we were to enter a bear market. Table 2[6] shows the declines experienced during the last 20 bear markets over the past 140 years[7]. The right-most column applies these declines to the recent S&P500 high of 2,100.

Table 2

As shown in Table 2, a decline that is equivalent to the average of all 20 bear markets will indicate a market low of about 1,300 in the S&P 500, a fall of nearly 40%. None of this analysis means that a decline of this extent, or any decline at all, is imminent. However, an investor will do well to prepare herself mentally for such a decline and understand that a ≈40% decline in a bear market is a rather normal event.

That is not all that we can learn from past experience. As we would have expected, there is a significant relationship between valuation levels at the beginning of a bear market and the subsequent decline experienced. Table 3 shows the level of cyclically adjusted price to earnings (CAPE) ratio at the beginning and end of each one of the past 20 bear markets except for the first one[8].

Table 3

The correlation between beginning CAPE levels and the subsequent declines experienced is 57%. What this means is that the higher the CAPE at beginning, the larger the subsequent decline. The CAPE multiple at the end of June 2015 was nearly 27, higher than 17 of the past 20 bear markets.

Investors will be well served to keep in mind and mentally prepare for what historical experience has taught us regarding market fluctuations during a bear market. We don't recommending jumping ship. But ensure that you have your life jackets and safety boats ready and at your disposal.


[1] This article is inspired by the talk delivered by Benjamin Graham at University of California, Los Angeles, on December 7, 1959. You can find an article based on Benjamin Graham's talk here.

[2] As evidenced by S&P 500's move from the lows in March 2009 to recent highs in June of 2015.

[3] Do not be fooled by the Rate of Change (RoC) chart in Figure 1. Just because the RoC peaked doesn't mean that the markets had a decline immediately afterward. All it means is that the rate of advance slowed.

[4] Data for 925 – 1929 is taken from following link: http://www.usstuckonstupid.com/sos_downchart.php?year=1920_1939&units=s&chart=gdp&bar=1&stack=1&size=m&title=&color=c#sos302

[5] Talk delivered by Benjamin Graham at University of California, Los Angeles, on December 7, 1959.

[6] The calculations in this table are based on monthly closing price data. As the intra-month highs and lows are likely to have been higher and lower respectively when compared to the month end numbers, this table likely understates the extent of full declines experienced.

[7] Nerdy Details: For the purposes of this analysis, we have defined a bear market as any period during which the peak to bottom decline equaled or exceeded 20% on a monthly closing basis. Further, we have defined a bull market which resulted in an upward move of 25% or more from the lows on a monthly closing basis.

[8] The CAPE data is available from 1881 onwards. As the Bear Market #1 took place before 1881, the CAPE data is not available for this bear market move.


Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment