In an effort to convince the market that rate hikes are coming, an amusing parade of Fed parrots squawked in full force over the weekend, within an hour or so of each other.
St. Louis Fed President James Bullard
Bullard Squawks: Bullard Says He Argued Against Fed's Call to Leave Rates on Hold.
"The case for policy normalization is quite strong, since Committee objectives have essentially been met," Bullard said in slides prepared for a speech in Nashville, Tennessee. "I argued against the decision at the FOMC meeting."
Bullard is not a voting member of the policy-setting Federal Open Market Committee in 2015, but will vote in 2016.
Richmond Fed Jeffrey Lacker
Lacker Squawks: Fed's Lacker Says Economy Strong Enough for Higher Rates.
"Such exceptionally low real interest rates are unlikely to be appropriate for an economy with persistently strong consumption growth and tightening labor markets," Lacker said in a statement.
He was the lone dissenter among the 10 Fed officials who voted at the meeting. Lacker said the Fed's target should rise by a quarter point.
Lacker has a history of dissent in Fed policy meetings. In 2012, he voted against eight straight policy decisions by the central bank. At the time he was urging the Fed to wind down asset purchases that were aimed at stimulating the economy.
San Francisco Fed President John Williams
Williams Squawks: Fed's Williams Still Sees 2015 Rate Hike After 'Close Call'
An interest rate hike will likely be appropriate this year given the U.S. Federal Reserve's decision last week to stand pat was a "close call," a top Fed policymaker said on Saturday.
John Williams, a centrist and president of the San Francisco Fed, said the arguments for and against beginning to tighten U.S. monetary policy are about balanced now that the economy is on solid footing, giving him confidence in continued economic and labor market growth.
If the arguments for and against the hike are "balanced" and the case for a hike "quite strong" then why was the vote 9-1?
By the way, wasn't the case even stronger a year ago? If not, why?
The answer to that is the Fed had a script that said "hike in 2015".
These economic illiterates not only ignore obvious asset bubbles, they actually believe a quarter of a point hike can sink the real economy. They also did not want to surprise the market with early hikes.
Why All the Squawking?
The Fed parrots are out in force, loudly squawking the same tune, because Yellen really wants to hike, provided of course the market goes along. Lately however, the market has had other ideas.
The market did not go along with a hike in September so that forced Yellen to come up with a basket of excuses for not hiking. In response, the market has moved the hike odds to 2016, but the parrots don't like that.
Toss Out the Script
Bloomberg says Wall Street Tosses Out Bond-Trading Script After Fed Meeting
Neil Bouhan at BMO Capital Markets expected the Federal Reserve to raise interest rates this week. Now he's questioning all his views on the central bank.
He's not the only one. Strategists and traders across Wall Street are re-examining their approach to predicting the Fed's moves after officials kept their target near zero Thursday and released an unexpectedly dovish policy statement. Fed Chair Janet Yellen cited a range of concerns -- from slowing growth in China to global market volatility -- to explain the decision to hold the benchmark overnight rate at historic lows.
The tone of her comments in a press conference after the announcement surprised the bond market, fueling the biggest rally in two-year Treasuries since March 2009, when the Fed said it was expanding its bond-buying program. It also left many prognosticators struggling to pinpoint how to trade in the lead-up to the next policy meeting less than six weeks away.
"There is really no way to look at this market if you can't handicap Fed policy, and they've made that much more difficult," said Bouhan, a Chicago-based strategist at BMO. He doesn't expect the central bank will raise interest rates until 2016.
"What we learned from yesterday is that Treasuries are a buy either way," Guy Haselmann, head of capital market strategy with Scotiabank, wrote in a note to clients Friday.
John Briggs, head of strategy for the Americas at RBS Securities Inc., echoed the plea for more clarity. He compiled a list of 10 broad economic concerns that Yellen cited in the press conference, including energy prices, U.S. financial conditions and weaknesses in emerging markets.
"It's not common for the Fed to name all these things," he said from the firm's Stamford, Connecticut, office. "Where do they rank? Now we don't even know what to look at to determine whether they will raise rates or not."
Following the FOMC meeting, I reported Rate Hike Odds Shift to January 2016; 16.1% Chance of Hike in October.
The parrots are not happy with this shift in opinion, so they are squawking. They should have tried squawking at the meeting or before the meeting instead of now.
As a result, anyone with any bit of common sense wonders if the Fed will hike at all.
I concluded "By December, the economic data is likely to be weakening so much, that the Fed may not hike until the next recession is over."