• 556 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 557 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 558 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 958 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 963 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 965 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 968 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 968 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 969 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 971 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 971 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 975 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 975 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 976 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 978 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 979 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 982 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 983 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 983 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 985 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Connecting the Dots

Lonely Man

As much as we carry a long-term bias towards a continuation of the historically low yield market environment of the current decade, over the intermediate-term we still like the short side of Treasuries on the long end of the curve. From our perspective, this posture affords strong asymmetries, as we see much greater downside risks to bonds from several different policy outcomes through the end of the year, which are also structurally aligned with bearish technicals in these assets.

Similar to the correlated trend with the US dollar index over the past year (Figure 3), upside momentum in long-term Treasuries peaked at the end of January and has made progressively lower highs as momentum has been sold.

After the significant run-up in long-term Treasuries that began in January 2014, this descending topping pattern with diminishing momentum is typical (Figure 1) of how major bond runs have exhausted and reversed over the past thirty years, within their broader secular uptrends.

Since 10-year yields completed at the end of January our comparative retracement of the move that began with the taper tantrum in May 2013, we have speculated that the 10-year yield would eventually test long-term overhead resistance later this year. And while the trials and tribulations of the Fed's next move appear to have to pushed back that test, the song remains the same when it comes to the bearish topping structure still prevalent in long-term Treasuries and our suspicion that longer-term yields will at the very least test overhead resistance.

Curiously, we continue to follow the inverted profile of the secular high in the 10-year yield (Figures 11 & 12), that still appears to be replicating a comparative "head" of a massive head and shoulders reversal pattern. Should the long-term comparative remain even mildly prescient, our relative expectations towards the yield trough would need to be raised by approximately 100 basis points, subsequent to what would certainly be the most severe bear market in bonds since 1994. All things considered, we are less inclined to expect as severe market outcome, but will reserve judgement if and when the market tests and breaks above overhead resistance.

Outstanding of Fed policy, a major near-term potential catalyst to help instigate a move higher in yields is the hint by Draghi last week of his willingness to advocate a material increase in the ECB's stimulus program. With some now speculating (see Here) - as we comparatively suggested in September (see Here), of more than doubling the initial size; it would follow the Fed's playbook of how they expanded (2X) and built out their own stimulus programs in March 2009.

Our general take on the intermediate-term effects - which have been borne out in the markets since 2009 (*including the ECBs initial salvo this March - Figure 2), is that QE has historically supported yields as investors are shaken out of the safe-haven corners of the government bond market and into more reflationary asset positions that invariably weakens the dollar (Figures 6 & 7).

Moreover, from our perspective - and despite conventional wisdom that sees a weaker euro as the best remedy for what ails Europe, we would argue that a broadly weaker US dollar would have the greatest efficacy in the long-term, as it could reflexively affect inflation expectations worldwide - most notably in emerging markets that the IMF estimates will account for more than 70 percent of global growth through the end of this decade.

Despite a strong rally in the dollar Wednesday following the Fed decision that left rates unchanged but with a less dovish tone in the statement, we still find support from differentials in policy expectations already largely priced in to the dollar and expressing similar weak technical underpinnings (Figures 3, 9 & 10) of long-term Treasuries.

Figure 1
30-Year Treasury Bond
Larger Image

Figure 2
US and German 10-Year Yields
Larger Image

Figure 3
USDX and TLT Weekly Chart
Larger Image

Figure 4
Euro and Oil Weekly Charts
Larger Image

Figure 5
USDX Daily Chart
Larger Image

Figure 6
TIP:TLT, 10-Year US Yield and german 10-Year Tield 2008-2009 Weekly Charts
Larger Image

Figure 7
TIP:TLT, 10-Year US Yield and german 10-Year Tield 2014-2015 Weekly Charts
Larger Image

Figure 8
US Dollar Index Monthly 40-Year Chart
Larger Image

Figure 9
USDX 1984-1985 and 2014-2015 Monthly Charts
Larger Image

Figure 10
USDX 1984-1985 and 2014-2015 Dailly Charts
Larger Image

Figure 11
TNX 10-Year Yields 2009-2015 and 1979-1985 Inverted Weekly Charts
Larger Image

Figure 12
TNX 10-Year Yields 2009-2015 and 1970-1993 Inverted Monthly Charts
Larger Image

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment