• 4 days Quantum Computing Is The Newest Megatrend In Silicon Valley
  • 5 days How To Invest In The Cybersecurity Boom
  • 7 days Investors Are Patient With Unprofitable Giants
  • 9 days Wells Fargo Back In The Scandal Spotlight Once Again
  • 11 days 5 Stocks To Keep A Close Eye On This Year
  • 12 days As Auto Giants Flail, Look To Chip Stocks For Gains
  • 13 days Central America Is Ready For The Bitcoin Hustle
  • 15 days China’s Video Game Restrictions Unlikely To Slow Down Booming Industry
  • 16 days Top Performing Stocks As Inflation Fears Grow
  • 17 days US Airline Stocks Take A Beating On New EU Restrictions
  • 18 days This IPO Could Open Sustainable Fashion Floodgates
  • 19 days Crypto Crime Nets Another $2B Fraudster
  • 21 days This Week’s Hottest Meme Stocks
  • 22 days Why World Markets Should Be Watching Germany Closely
  • 24 days Could ‘Cultured’ Meat Rival The Plant-Based Megatrend?
  • 26 days ‘Easy Money’: Crypto Is Still Attracting Newbie Investors
  • 28 days Foreign Syndicates May Have Stolen Up To $400B In COVID Benefits
  • 29 days Gold Jumps Above $1800 Ahead Of Jackson Hole Summit
  • 29 days International Banks Blacklist Afghanistan Following Taliban Takeover
  • 31 days China’s Tycoons Are Getting A Serious Reality Check
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Obama 'No Boots on the Ground' Sends More Boots on the Ground

President Obama's "no boots on the ground" pledges have been broken so many times it's hard to keep track.

Today the president is back at it. Another 200 boots are on their way to the Mideast.


Backpedaling Begins

Please consider Obama Backs Over Previous Predictions of Taking Mosul From ISIS This Year

Iraqi and US officials have been talking up the idea that the Iraqi government, backed by US forces, would take over the major ISIS city of Mosul by year's end. President Obama seems to be rapidly backpedaling away from that prediction, as Iraqi defection mount.

In today's comments, President Obama would only say that Mosul will "eventually" fall back under Iraqi control, and said he figures by the end of the year the "conditions" will be in place whereby that eventual victory can happen sooner or later.

The comments came as the administration announced another 200 ground troops into a war that Obama has long insisted would have no boots on the ground at all, bringing the official US figure for troops to 4,087, and the overall US presence to well over 5,000.


More Boots on the Ground

After I read that, I wondered how many times Obama has pledged to not send "boots on the ground".

A quick search turned up this October 31, 2015, USA Today report: 16 times Obama said there would be no boots on the ground in Syria.

To be fair, this time we are talking about Iraq, not Syria.

Then again, I remind you ...

Interview with Meet the Press, Sept. 7, 2014

"(You) cannot, over the long term or even the medium term, deal with this problem by having the United States serially occupy various countries all around the Middle East. We don't have the resources. It puts enormous strains on our military. And at some point, we leave. And then things blow up again. So we've got to have a more sustainable strategy, which means the boots on the ground have to be Iraqi.

Address to the Nation on Syria, Sept. 10, 2014

"I want the American people to understand how this effort will be different from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. It will not involve American combat troops fighting on foreign soil.

Remarks at the White House, Feb. 11, 2015

"The resolution we've submitted today does not call for the deployment of U.S. ground combat forces to Iraq or Syria. It is not the authorization of another ground war, like Afghanistan or Iraq. ... As I've said before, I'm convinced that the United States should not get dragged back into another prolonged ground war in the Middle East. That's not in our national security interest, and it's not necessary for us to defeat ISIL. Local forces on the ground who know their countries best are best positioned to take the ground fight to ISIL, and that's what they're doing."


Just Advisors

Don't worry, those are just advisors ... well sort of advisors ... I think.

Dateline March 25, 2016: U.S. Marines Providing Artillery Fire to Support Advancing Iraqi Ground Troops.

My only conclusion, since I know Obama would never lie, is that Obama did not send in boots.

Rather, Obama sent in the artillery wearing high heels.

Obama says his authority to send in boots derives from an authorization that Congress passed on September 18, 2001 that specifically says the president is authorized to use force against those who planned, authorized or committed aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.

Since when was Syria or Iraq involved in 911?


High Heels Total vs. Boots Total

The previous question is moot. Syrian non-involvement in 911 is not the important matter.

Rather, the important point is that high heels and boots are completely different things. The official total is 4,087 pairs of high heels, and zero boots.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment