• 703 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 703 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 705 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,105 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,109 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,111 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,114 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,115 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,116 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,117 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,118 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,121 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,122 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,123 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,125 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,125 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,128 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,129 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,129 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,131 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
The Problem With Modern Monetary Theory

The Problem With Modern Monetary Theory

Modern monetary theory has been…

Billionaires Are Pushing Art To New Limits

Billionaires Are Pushing Art To New Limits

Welcome to Art Basel: The…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Introducing Yield Purchasing Power

The monetary debate seems artificially limited. On one side is Federal Reserve policy based on discretion. On the other is policy based on rules. It's Keynes vs. Friedman. It's central planning of our economy based on the reactive whims of wise monetary planners vs. central planning of our economy based on the proactive rules written by … wise monetary planners.

On the rules side, there is a sub-debate. Should we have central planning based on unemployment and the Consumer Price Index (as now) or switch to central planning based on another metric such as GDP?

Whether one is on team Keynes or team Friedman, whether one is on sub-team Friedman CPI or Friedman GDP, everyone seems to take something for granted. That is, the quantity theory of money. If the quantity rises, then prices follow. However, since prices (especially commodity prices) are not really rising, this would seem to give more leeway to the monetary planners, to inflict more monetary policy on us.

There is something about this which few acknowledge. To increase the quantity of dollars -- which is not money, but that's a whole 'nother discussion -- the Federal Reserve buys bonds. Whatever effect this may have on the price of a new Chevy, it obviously affects the price of the Treasury bond. It pushes the bond price up. Since the interest rate is a strict mathematical inverse of the bond price, we have an obvious conclusion.

The Fed is pushing down the rate of interest.

We can say that the interest rate is the collateral damage. The Keynesians and Friedmanites, in their zeal to increase the quantity of dollars, support or at least ignore the falling interest rate. OK, but who cares about the interest rate? You should care. Everyone is impacted by the 35-year global trend of falling interest rates.

The falling rate ushers in a kind of hyperinflation. You won't see it by looking at prices, or purchasing power. If you look at the value of your portfolio and divide by the cost of living, you may be lulled into a false sense of security.

You will see the hyperinflation, if you look at it another way. Instead of the liquidation price of assets, consider the yield on assets. Instead of selling off the family farm to buy groceries, think of operating that farm to grow food. Can you live on the crops you produce? Or must you liquidate piece of it, just to survive?

The same question applies to any capital asset including a bank balance. Is it possible to live on the interest?

In the cold harsh light of yield purchasing power, we can see the erosion of our capital base. Since civilization itself depends on capital accumulation, this erosion is a retrogressive force dragging us back to another dark age.

I gave a 45-minute presentation on Yield Purchasing Power at American Institute for Economic Research in Great Barrington, MA on October 14, 2016. I am grateful to the Institute for recording video of my presentation plus extended Q&A. The video is here.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment