• 142 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 147 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 149 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 152 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 152 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 153 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 155 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 155 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 159 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 159 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 160 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 162 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 163 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 166 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 167 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 167 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 169 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  • 170 days Europe’s Economy Is On The Brink As Putin’s War Escalates
  • 173 days What’s Causing Inflation In The United States?
  • 174 days Intel Joins Russian Exodus as Chip Shortage Digs In
What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

An economic slowdown in many…

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

This aging bull market may…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Two Trends That Will Force The Fed To Start Buying Stocks

While the Japanese and Swiss central banks have turned themselves into hedge funds by loading up on equities, the US Fed has stuck to supporting the stock market indirectly, by buying bonds. It's worked, obviously, with all major US indexes at record highs. But it won't work going forward, thanks to two gathering trends.

First, the main way bond buying supports equities is by lowering interest rates which, among other things, allows corporations to borrow cheaply and use the proceeds to buy back their own stock. Companies avoid paying dividends on the repurchased stock and the government gets capital gains tax revenue from a bull market. From a short-sighted Keynesian perspective, it's a win-win.

Alas, this New Age public/private partnership on running out of steam. Interest rates have fallen about as far as they can fall and corporations have borrowed about as much as they can borrow. So the buyback binge is topping:

Share Buybacks Sink For Second Straight Year

(Forbes) – According to S&P Dow Jones Indices, companies of the S&P 500 index in the fourth quarter pulled back on their share repurchases by 7.2% from the fourth quarter 2015, although they accelerated 20.6% sequentially.

Companies spent $135.3 billion buying back their shares during the fourth quarter, compared to $112.2 billion from the third quarter and $145.9 billion in the fourth quarter 2015. For the full year, they spent $536.4 billion on buybacks, a decline from $546.4 billion in 2015 and $553.3 billion in 2014 – the first time the index saw two consecutive years of declines since the financial crisis era or 2008 and 2009.

S&P500 Quarterlt Buybacks

A longer-term but potentially much bigger problem for equities can be found in the structure of US retirement savings accounts. At age 70, holders of IRAs are required to start cashing them out, and as the number of Boomer retirees soars the size of these required sales will rise commensurately. Here's a snippet from a longer analysis by Economica's Chirs Hamilton. The full article is here.

Required Minimum Distributions Spell Disaster (& Even Greater Intervention) As Sellers To Overwhelm Buyers

Simply put, investing for the long term had it's time but that time is drawing to a close. The math is pretty easy...we'll have too many sellers and too few buyers. Why? At age 70.5 years old, retirees are mandated by force of law to sell tax deferred assets accumulated over their lifetime and do so in a 15 year period. Conversely, buyers, incented by tax deferral (but not forced to buy by law), generally have a 35yr window of accumulation. Over the past 65 years (on a population basis), there were three new buyers for every new seller. Over the next 25 years (on a population basis), there will be three new sellers for every new buyer.

2015-2040 Buyers versus Sellers

In the next downturn, corporations will stop buying -- as they always do at bottoms -- and retirees will be forced by both necessity and law to liquidate some of their nest eggs. Combined, these sales will put unacceptable downward pressure on stock prices, leading to the kinds of instability that over-leveraged systems can't handle.

The Fed – and probably the ECB – will then join the BOJ and SNB in buying equities. Like QE and the other recent monetary experiments, this might be seen by mainstream economists as a good thing. But it's not. For at least three reasons why it's not, see We're All Hedge Funds Now, Part 4: Central Banks Become World's Biggest Stock Speculators for at least three reasons why it will make a bad situation infinitely worse.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment