• 97 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 102 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 104 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 107 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 107 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 108 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 110 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 110 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 114 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 114 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 115 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 117 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 118 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 121 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 122 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 122 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 124 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  • 125 days Europe’s Economy Is On The Brink As Putin’s War Escalates
  • 128 days What’s Causing Inflation In The United States?
  • 129 days Intel Joins Russian Exodus as Chip Shortage Digs In
Zombie Foreclosures On The Rise In The U.S.

Zombie Foreclosures On The Rise In The U.S.

During the quarter there were…

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

What's Behind The Global EV Sales Slowdown?

An economic slowdown in many…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Outlook for 2006

What will 2006 be like? Let me set the mood with my favorite Einstein joke.

Einstein dies and goes to heaven. Since heaven, for obvious reasons, is a centrally planned economy, St. Peter sheepishly informs him that they have a temporary housing shortage. He'll have to bunk with three other guys for a while.

Of course his new roomies are thrilled. The first one comes up to him and says: "Mr. Einstein, it's an honor to meet you. But I'd like to get to know you better. I have an IQ of 130". So Einstein says: "Great. After lunch, let's bounce around some ideas on astrophysics I've been working on."

Then the second one comes up to him, and says: "Mr. Einstein, it's an honor. I'd also like to get to know you. I have an IQ of 100." So Einstein says: "Fine. Let me put my grip away, and we'll have a game of chess."

Then the third one walks up, and says: "Hi, Mr. Einstein. I'd also like to get to know you. But I'm afraid I'm not as smart as those other guys; I've only got an IQ of 70." Einstein says: "So where do you think interest rates are going?"

Some Generalities ...

On the one hand, discussions of the economy and the markets should be for amusement purposes only. Since it's impossible to know what the finances, motives, constraints, and desires of six billion people might be, it's impossible to know what they're going to do, or when. On the other hand, there is such a thing as human nature. Actions do have consequences. The madness of crowds exists. And both history and markets exhibit definite trends over time. Like many things in life, looking at the markets can lead you to paradox.

When establishment economists prognosticate, their guesses are typically gussied up with convoluted theories and complex mathematical formulae. Their predictions are overwhelmingly bullish, partly because they're really just extrapolations of the prevailing trend, and partly because that's the politically savvy view to hold. This is not to accuse most economists of being idiots, even though I think most of their theories and formulae are idiotic. On the contrary, it's highly intelligent to be bullish - because throughout history things have always gotten better (albeit punctuated with setbacks, ranging in length and depth from the recent recession to the Dark Ages). Clearly, the longest trend in existence is the ascent of man, and it's likely to continue. Indeed, despite my cynicism on the world as it is, I think the ascent will likely accelerate.

So, all this having been said, what do I think? As you know, I think the U.S. is riding for a serious fall; that opinion has historically constrained my ability to capitalize on domestic stock, bond, and property bull markets. At the same time, I like to play to the strong suits in any game. That has led me to the opinion that over time, some foreign countries will do better than the U.S. And that it's only common sense, considering the fate of the dollar, to keep a close eye on commodities in general and precious metals in particular.

It's just a question of timing. In brief, the U.S. stock, bond, and property markets had a fantastic run from roughly 1980 to roughly 2000, with most of the gains made towards the end, as confidence built. Precious metals (notwithstanding some spectacular bear market rallies) did the opposite. I, and hopefully most subscribers, used those years to build large positions in metals and mining stocks. I don't expect to liquidate these things wholesale for at least a few years. And at vastly higher prices.

A Few Particulars ...

Oh, I almost forgot. What about 2006? I rather expect to see gold well over $700, silver closing in on $20, oil at where it now is (but likely closer to $100). The stock market resuming the downtrend it started in 2000, interrupted since October 2003. Interest rates will be heading up decisively. And the U.S. property market is headed down decisively - along with the dollar. All of which should result in a quintuple whammy on Americans' standard of living, which will likely be compounded by a turnaround in the balance of trade (fewer free goodies from abroad in exchange for paper money) and higher domestic inflation (as some of the trillions of dollars Americans have shipped abroad come home, to be redeemed for real goods). I'm not necessarily expecting the Greater Depression to be announced on CNN this year, but I'll be surprised if the average American doesn't become more concerned about his standard of living and financial future.

And Some Problematic Questions ....

The big X factor, as always, remains the government. Frankly, I never expect anything good from government. And here I refer to the institution itself. How can you, considering that its main products are wars, pogroms, prosecutions, persecutions, taxation, regulation, inflation, and assorted idiocy. These aren't just accidental characteristics; the actual essence of government is coercion, and coercion is not a good thing. Worse, the people drawn to "service" of the State aren't the "best and brightest", as their propagandists put out, but the worst and dullest; they're people who believe in organized coercion. Who else could even consider working for such an organization? That's why "throwing the bums out" is a pointless exercise in self-delusion.

America's long slide towards authoritarianism has greatly accelerated since our version of the Reichstag fire on 9/11, and I see no prospect of it even slowing, much less reversing. It makes me nostalgic for the days of Reagan; even if the reality was two steps backward for one step forward, he at least seemed good-hearted. The Baby Bush, on the other hand, appears to be stupid, ignorant, stubborn, and mean-spirited. I don't know whether or not to credit the reports that he's hitting the bottle again and flies into fits of rage when his will is challenged. Is it possible Bush is also psychologically imbalanced? That is certainly possible, given his stated views on torture. But, looking to the bright side, at least he's not Dick Cheney, who appears to be a genuinely degraded being.

What's likely to happen with the wars they've started? My guess is that they'll grow and spread. Maybe the catalyst will be another big event in the otherwise phony War on Terror. Maybe it will be some type of airstrike on Iran, because of their nuclear program. Certainly, the numbers of Iraqis and Afghans who join the guerrilla resistance movements will grow. It's foolish to think they like foreign troops running around their countries any more than we'd like an Islamic army in the U.S., however well intentioned.

Will the U.S. pull out? That's the best case, of course, although it would result in some type of civil war in both countries. The U.S. will eventually leave, of course, but I don't expect that to happen until it literally can no longer afford to stay.

The generational theory of history I outlined in the International Speculator seems to be developing fairly accurately, and truly titanic war would seem to be in the cards in the decade to come. Maybe with the Islamic world, more likely with the Chinese. Perhaps with some government, or group, that seems most unlikely right now. Who would have guessed, in 1941, that we'd be fighting the Koreans in 1951? And who would have guessed, in 1955, that we'd be fighting the Vietnamese in 1965? The current dust-up with Iraq was certainly off the radar screen back when Saddam was our ally. Fortunately, those were, and are, among the smallest and most backward countries in the world, even though the wars were quite unpleasant. In the next one, it might turn out we get into a tangle with somebody our own size.

I guess my bottom line prediction is that you should rig for stormy weather. But you'll be well able to afford it with the profits you'll make in selected gold and gold stocks in 2006. Which should be an excellent year for us, even if not the world at large.

Get in Before it's Too Late!

For a short while, likely only six to twelve months, alert investors have the opportunity to accumulate carefully selected gold stocks at bargain basement prices - prices that all but guarantee the sort of spectacular returns Doug Casey is famous for.

His latest gold stock win just posted a 972% return. There's still time for you to get in ahead of the clueless masses and make an investment fortune. Act Now...

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment