• 261 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 261 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 263 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 663 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 667 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 669 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 672 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 673 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 674 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 675 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 676 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 680 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 680 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 681 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 683 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 683 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 687 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 687 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 688 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 690 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Housing Permits a Leading Indicator? Of What?

Blame the Weaher

Econoday made this claim: "Starts can be affected by weather which along with related adjustments are always factors for this reading in the winter months."

It's amusing how economists never seem to know what the weather "was" until economic reports come out a month later.

"Very Solid Report"

What really caught my eye was Econoday's opening gambit.

"A surprising but perhaps one-time drop in single-family starts masks what is otherwise a very solid housing starts and permits report for December. ... But the backlog behind future starts continues to build as permits came in very strong, virtually steady at a 1.302 million rate and showing a noticeable 1.8 percent gain for single-family permits to 881,000."

Leading Indicators

The Consumer Conference Board's list of Leading Indicators" rel="noopener noreferrer">Leading Indicators contains housing permits, the S&P 500, the yield curve, IMS, weekly earnings, M2, and the University of Michigan's Consumer sentiment report.

Permits a "Backlog of Future Starts"

Let's investigate the claim in pictures.

Starts vs Permits

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/maven-user-photos/mishtalk/economics/zmfATcSa4EegwR7v_znq6Q/1C4aneqiQ0S_ryAB4kOkrg

 

Starts vs. Permits Synopsis

  • Permits are not a leading indicator of starts.
  • If there are sales, homebuilders will start homes.
  • If there are not sales, homebuilders will not start construction no matter how many permits they have.

Starts vs. Permits - Percent Change from Year Ago

https://s3-us-west-2.amazonaws.com/maven-user-photos/mishtalk/economics/zmfATcSa4EegwR7v_znq6Q/my0vjlDOKkG9EIo3yHxJaQ

Although permits are required to do a start, permits do not represent a "backlog behind future starts".

In fact, year-over-year spikes in permits tend to be a lagging indicator.

By Mike Shedlock

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment