• 4 days Visa, Mastercard Slump Amid Covid Worries, Regulatory Outlook
  • 5 days 3 Biotech Stocks Wall Street Loves This Quarter
  • 9 days Fintech Goes “Green”, Joining $30T ESG Boom
  • 10 days U.S. Cargo Theft Spikes Amid Huge Supply Chain Snarl Ups
  • 11 days Buybacks Are Back, But New Taxes Could Dull the Party
  • 13 days Don’t Be Fooled By Musk’s Twitter Performance
  • 18 days 3 Healthcare Sector Stocks to Watch Right Now
  • 19 days More Trouble Ahead for Supply Chain as Hackers Descend
  • 20 days Saudi Arabia To Invest $64 Billion Into Becoming A New Global Cinema Hub
  • 23 days The Cryptic Squid Strikes, Netting Scammers Nearly $4M
  • 23 days October Jobs Impress but Inflation Threatens Recovery
  • 25 days Another Round of ‘Meme’ Stocks Coming Our Way?
  • 25 days 2021’s Black Friday Bummer
  • 27 days Buy-Now-Pay-Later Is A Huge Threat to Credit Cards
  • 30 days Microsoft Passes Apple As World’s Most Valuable Company Amid Stellar Earnings
  • 31 days 3 IPOs from Big to Small Coming Our Way
  • 32 days Robinhood Investors Balk at ‘Meme’ Growth
  • 33 days $12M Seized in Massive US-Dubai Money-Laundering Raid
  • 34 days China Launches Digital Yuan As U.S. Dallies
  • 36 days ‘Unicorns’ Are Now Small Fry in the Era of ‘Decacorns’
Coinbase IPO Explodes, But Fails To Keep Its Momentum

Coinbase IPO Explodes, But Fails To Keep Its Momentum

Giant cryptocurrency exchange, Coinbase Global…

Mid-Term Bitcoin Outlook Remains Murky

Mid-Term Bitcoin Outlook Remains Murky

The mid-term bitcoin outlook remains…

$30,000 Is The New $20,000 For Bitcoin

$30,000 Is The New $20,000 For Bitcoin

Year-to-date, Bitcoin is up more…

Crypto Insider

Crypto Insider

Cryptoinsider.com

Crypto Insider provides high-quality, long-form analytical pieces, investigative journalism, with less emphasis on breaking news. Our mission is to maintain high journalistic standards in the…

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. Cryptocurrencies
  3. Bitcoin

Bitcoin's Biggest Website Faces Criticism Over Sponsorship Deal

BTC

The new sponsorship deal on Bitcoin.org of Paxful, a P2P Bitcoin marketplace, brings some controversy. On a GitHub thread, one of the Bitcoin.org owners claims that the $20k per month sponsorship will be mainly used for website and content purposes, and for community rewards.

Paxful is a Bitcoin marketplace and P2P platform (peer-to-peer) that lets individuals buy and sell bitcoin online. The platform has over 50,000 customers and offers more than 300 ways to pay with bitcoin. An article on Medium refers to Paxful as “a safe place to get crypto quickly without hassle."

Promoters of Paxful argue that the platform is one of the safest places to buy bitcoins. However, some users have complained about Paxful in the past, which could lead people to think of the crypto marketplace as a scam.

Why is it controversial for Bitcoin.org to be funded by Paxful? How does it impact the reputation of bitcoin.org?

Reputation at Stake?

Among other features, Bitcoin.org allows users and crypto enthusiasts to buy bitcoin. Businesses, individuals, and organizations can acquire the cryptocurrency safely on the website. Bitcoin.org receives supports and funds from its community and domain owners. A Bitcoin Foundation partnership ended in 2015.

The new partnership between Paxful and Bitcoin.org, established last July 2018, is mentioned on several bitcoin.org pages, which could be seen as a promotion. Why does this bring controversy? Related: China’s Trail Of Unsustainable Debt

Such a deal opens a few questions over the neutrality of Bitcoin.org.

Endorsement, partnership, or promotion?

The principles of Bitcoin as a peer-to-peer platform could be threatened, as stated in the Github thread. “Peer-to-peer refers to systems that work like an organized collective by allowing each individual to interact directly with the others.” Bitcoin uses peer-to-peer technology to operate with no central authority or banks. By nature, the platform is autonomous, safe, and transparent. Does the partnership of Paxful with Bitcoin.org violate users' trust and jeopardize bitcoin.org neutrality?

The fact that Paxful is sponsoring bitcoin.org may appear as a commercial or promotional behavior, not aligned to the principles of the blockchain. The Paxful sponsorship appears more as a promotion than a donation (or in this case a sponsorship), which implies the idea of commercialization. This principle goes against bitcoin.org as a neutral information resource about Bitcoin. Furthermore, since Paxful has been accused of questionable practices in the past, the deal brings issue over data integrity and transparency, which may violate users' trust.

Communication and reporting needed. Where do the funds go?

There are calls for bitcoin.org owners to expose how they will benefit from the sponsorship of $20k per month. They should further post clear statements about deals and sponsoring organizations, for transparency, and add a tab named “sponsors” to the website. As of today, the bitcoin.org owners claim that the funds shall be mainly used to modernize the content and layout of the bitcoin.org website, as well as to develop a translation portal and create a Bounty program to reward contributors.

Both Paxful and Bitcoin.org should remain transparent about where the money goes, and update users. Finally, to showcase that the deal is clear of commercial interest, Bitcoin.org should report frequently to users on how sponsorship money is used, and perhaps unlink "get bitcoins" from the "buy" button on Paxful.

By Angel Deforge via Crypto Insider

More Top Reads From Safehaven.com

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment