• 657 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 658 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 659 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,059 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,064 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,066 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,069 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,069 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,070 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,072 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,072 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,076 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,076 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,077 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,079 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,080 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,083 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,084 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,084 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,086 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Bernanke's Bag of Hammers

After one of the most concerted rhetorical attacks on the threat of inflation in recent memory, Bernanke's Fed has pushed the odds of a June rate hike above 80%. It goes without saying that stocks - which rallied last week as June rate hike expectations plunged below 50% - have been hurt this week.

Unless Bernanke and company want to convince the markets that they see the Fed's rate hiking campaign continuing into the second half of 2006, they need to zip it. To be sure, three Fed officials (Bernanke, Bies, and Poole) have spent the last two days waving their inflation fighting flags because they wanted investors to understand that a rate hike at the end of June was a forgone conclusion. Mission accomplished. Any further flag waving could make investor's think that the Fed has gone mad. After all, in March the Fed was contemplating a pause, in April Bernanke was suggesting a pause regardless of the inflation readings, and the pause theme played in theaters across the world in May. All of sudden - as if the Fed never had access to commodity prices - the pause story has left the building?

In other words, the reason why the Fed needs to zip it is because it is impossible to micromanage investor expectations and financial markets. Moreover, any consistent attempt to do so is likely to achieve undesirable effects. Here is a hypothetical: the Dow Jones Industrial Average plunges by 1,279 points tomorrow and the Fed needs (or thinks they need) to intervene to stop the selling. With one phrase - 'liquidity baby!' - Bubbles' Greenspan would be able to bounce the Dow higher by 700 points the next day. By contrast, Bernanke, already armed with the baggage of his pause flip-flopping and 'lapse of judgment' comments, is perhaps only able to will a 200 point rebound...

Point being, in an attempt to acquire inflation fighting credibility the Fed could lose their crisis fighting abilities. This would especially be the case if the Fed, either via an incredible overshoot in rates or continued display of disjointed verbiage, were to play a major role in sparking such a crisis.

And yes, the Nikkei dropped below its 200-DMA overnight.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment