Fed chief Ben Bernanke left traders guessing about the central bank's next move on interest rates after his testimony before the Senate Banking Committee on July 19th. The Fed could call for an immediate cease-fire at 5.25% with enough monetary tightening already in the pipeline, or it could cap the two-year rate hike campaign at 5.50%, to defend the US dollar and keep global commodity prices in check.

"There are risks in both directions, if I may say so. Clearly, we don't want to tighten too much to cause our economy to grow more slowly than its potential. The risk in the other direction is that, were we to stop tightening too soon and inflation were to get higher and more persistent, then we would be faced with a situation of having to address that later on with perhaps even more rate increases," Bernanke added.

Arguing on the side of an immediate cease-fire on rate hikes, Bernanke added, "We must take account of the possible future effects of previous policy actions, that is, of policy effects still in the pipeline. The lags between policy actions and their effects imply that we must be forward-looking, basing our policy choices on the longer-term outlook for both inflation and economic growth," he said.

Then, uttering one of his trade-mark zig-zags, Bernanke said, "High energy and commodity prices combined with low unemployment, and high use rates in factories in plants may sustain inflation pressures in the real economy and would be costly to reverse. The Fed must guard against the emergence of an inflationary psychology that could impart greater persistence to what would otherwise be a transitory increase in inflation," he said.

But while Bernanke is keeping traders in the dark about the Fed's next move, Kansas City Fed chief Thomas Hoenig is more transparent. The two-year series of interest rate hikes have shifted US monetary policy from a "very accommodative stance to a restrictive one," he said. And the next batch of economic data between now and August 8th, should not alter the big picture outlook. "Policy is not made from the most recent data point. It has to be made in the context of accumulated data."

Fed Grows Wary of Inverted Yield Curve

Arguing against a rate hike to 5.50% on August 8th, is the appearance of an inverted yield curve, with the US Treasury's 10-year note yielding 42 basis points less than the US dollar 1-year Libor rate. Historically, an inverted yield curve has signaled an economic recession in the ensuing six-to-12 months. But while US recessions have usually been preceded by an inverted curve, not all inverted curves have resulted in a recession. Bernanke has already hiked the fed funds by 75 basis points in defiance of an inverted yield curve, and is reluctant to push his luck much further.

The inverted yield curve would at least signal slower economic growth, but not spell a contraction of gross domestic product for two consecutive quarters, the typical definition of a recession, anytime soon. The US economy, which grew in the first quarter at a 5.6% pace, the fastest spurt in 2-½ years, is expected to slow to a 3% rate in the second half of this year, according to Fed forecasts.

The Fed's last two rate hikes have knocked the S&P 500 index about 6% off its May 11th highs, and banks' profit margins are getting squeezed, when the short-term rates they pay to borrow money are higher than the long-term rates at which they lend, a situation that can discourage lending and hurt economic growth. Bernanke must also take the US political calendar into consideration, and avoid taking any drastic steps that can hurt the Bush White House in November.

Senator Jim Bunning, a Kentucky Republican, scolded Mr. Bernanke on July 19th, and raised concerns that the Fed will push up rates too high and hurt the economy. Saying he was disappointed in Bernanke's leadership, Senator Bunning maintained that "inflation is not out of control. The Fed is chasing an inflation monster that is just not there," he said, (brushing aside the price of crude oil at $75 per barrel).

Would the Fed follow the Bank of Canada?

Would the Federal Reserve follow the footsteps of the Bank of Canada, which balked at a rate hike beyond 4.25% on July 11th, despite elevated inflation readings and a very tight labor market in Canada? The BOC had lifted its overnight loan rate by 175 basis points since last September, and defended its decision to hold rates steady on July 11th, by pointing to a strong Canadian dollar, which is hurting Canadian exports to the US, which buys 85% of Canadian sales abroad.

"The anticipated moderation of US growth, combined with the lagged effects of past interest rate and exchange rate increases, brings aggregate supply and demand back into balance," the BOC said on July 13th. Beneath the surface however, the BOC is wary of raising short-term rates further, after its last rate hike in May, briefly inverted the Canadian yield curve, hurting the profit margins of Canadian banks.

The Bank of Canada often coordinates its interest rate maneuvers with the Fed, and its decision to hold pat at 4.25% on July 11th, might be a tip-off that it expects the Fed to pause its rate hike campaign at 5.25% on August 8th. In the event the Fed surprises the market with a quarter-point rate hike to 5.50%, it wouldn't sadden the BOC to watch the Canadian Petro-dollar tumble from its 15-year highs.

But the Bank of Canada has the luxury of taking a breather on rate hikes, despite elevated core inflation numbers, because it enjoys a strong Canadian dollar, that helps keep import prices down. On the other hand, the Federal Reserve is the guardian of the chronically weak US dollar, beset by massive external deficits, and so a premature rate pause by the Fed carries much bigger risks, and can badly tarnish its anti-inflation reputation. If necessary, the BOC could hike its overnight loan rate again later this year, without a blemish on its anti-inflation record.

The Fed's Dilemma, Defend the US Dollar or US Home Prices

A slowdown in the US housing market is thought to have been a big reason why US retail sales fell 0.1% in June. Re-sales of single-family homes fell 1.5% in May to an annual rate of 5.82 million. Buyers are discouraged by 30-year mortgage rates that rose to 6.71% last week, the highest since May 2002. The supply of existing homes rose 5.5% to 3.6 million units or 6.5 months' worth at the end of May.

Up to 40% of US home loans were of non-traditional types such as adjustable rate and no-money-down mortgages in 2005. "Some people will soon be faced with adjustable rate loans re-pricing under less favorable conditions," said Chicago Fed chief Michael on May 18th. Another Fed rate hike to 5.50%, would put a greater crunch on Americans who are borrowing more and saving less to support their shopping habits. The US personal saving rate as a percentage of disposable income, slipped to a negative 1.7% in May.

Housing accounted for a third of total US growth and about half of private payroll jobs created since 2001. Fed data shows home price appreciation helped add $5.2 trillion to consumers' balance sheets during the current expansion, or 68% of all wealth creation. So further rate hikes by the Fed to fight inflation carries a big risk of tipping the US economy into an outright recession.

The last three Fed rate rates under Bernanke's watch, were initiated in defiance of an inverted yield curve, and did tremendous damage to US homebuilder shares. Fed officials have downplayed the predictive powers of the yield curve, and have pressed on with the rate hike campaign to defend the US dollar from speculative attack, and to contain surging gold and commodity prices. But after a 50% correction in the DJ Homebuilder index from record highs in August 2005, bargain hunters are sifting through the rubble of the once high-flying US housing sector.

As for the Fed's next move on August 8th, the odds favor a pause in the rate hike campaign at 5.25%. Politics is becoming a key consideration now. A Bloomberg/Los Angeles Times poll on June 27th, showed by a 65% to 22% margin, that Americans oppose another rate increase by the Fed, worried about the value of their homes, and rising mortgage payments on variable loans. Therefore, the politically correct modus of operandi is to maintain a steady fed funds rate at 5.25% in August.

The Bernanke Fed would sub-contract the job of fighting global inflation to other central banks. But a premature pause in the Fed's rate hike campaign in August, could also knock the US dollar lower, while other central banks are tightening their monetary policies. A weaker US dollar, in turn, could put a floor under gold and other key commodities like crude oil and base metals, and lift US import price inflation.

Gold has been on a wild rollercoaster ride this year, mostly tracking the direction of global stock markets for real-time clues about the health of the global economy and inflationary pressures. With the initial outbreak of war between Hizbollah and Israel, gold detached itself from the MSCI World index in mid-July, with the yellow metal moving higher, while global stock markets were tumbling lower.

After peaking at $675 on July 17th however, the fortunes of gold and the MSCI world index reversed, with gold sinking to as low as $600 /oz, and global stock markets rebounding higher. The reversal of fortunes was based on the perception that the Lebanon war won't spread to Iran and Syria. After all the see-sawing, both gold and the MSCI World stock index have moved back into alignment. At other times, gold has tracked crude oil prices, blurring the focus of gold traders.

Federal Reserve banking on Steady Oil prices

Fed chief Ben Bernanke is betting on steady oil prices in the months ahead, to help smooth out the US inflation rate, and justify a rate pause in August. On July 19th, Bernanke said that a "moderation in economic activity that should help to limit inflation pressures over time," implying that a soft landing for the US economy can also keep oil prices, gold, and the "Commodity Super Cycle" under wraps.

However, Bernanke made similar comments on April 17th, when the price of crude oil settled at $70.40 per barrel. "In the longer run, these inflation effects should fade even if energy prices remain elevated, so long as monetary policy keeps inflation expectations well-anchored by responding appropriately to future price and output developments. While the increase in energy prices had pushed headline inflation up sharply, the impact on core inflation appears to have been relatively modest."

No doubt, we shall hear more brainwashing by Fed officials about the low "core" rate of inflation that strips out the bare necessities of life. But even the radical inflationist, ECB chief Jean Claude Trichet acknowledged on July 12th, that high oil and commodity prices demand close attention, and should not be ignored when measuring true inflation levels in the Euro zone. "The phenomenon we are observing is very important and we have to understand it," he said.

Since Bernanke's off-target prognostication on April 17th, the price of crude oil has climbed $5 to $75.50 per barrel. From the chart above, the Fed has been chasing oil prices with baby-step rate hikes since mid-2004. However, in order to merely catch-up with the upward spiral in crude oil prices, the Fed would need to target the fed funds rate at 6%, but that would surely sink the US housing markets.

The Fed can no longer keep pace with spiraling oil prices, and must rely on baby-step rate hikes by the Bank of Japan, the ECB, and other central banks to rein in crude oil prices. But crude oil is the kingpin of the "Commodity Super Cycle" and only surrendered about $5 per barrel, during the global stock market meltdown from May 11th to June 13th, before recouping its losses and setting new record highs in July.

Betting on foreign central banks to contain oil prices is just a pipe-dream. The European Central Bank is inflating the Euro M3 money supply at a 8.9% annual clip, designed to insulate the European stock markets from the rising costs of energy. The ECB's monetization of crude oil is just starting to backfire, with European headline inflation rates creeping higher, due to the rising cost of energy and its secondary knock-on effects. The widely telegraphed ECB rate hike to 3.00% on August 3rd, won't put a dent in the Euro M3 money supply, nor undermine the price of crude oil.

The Bank of England, has been conspicuously absent from the G-10's monetary tightening campaign this year, Instead, the BOE is quietly inflating the British M4 money supply at an annualized rate of 11.7%, twice the growth rate from three years ago, to insulate the British stock market from the shock of escalating oil prices. London futures traders are now betting on a quarter-point rate hike by the BOE to 4.75% this year, but still "too little, too late", to rein-in the UK's M4 money supply, or the high flying crude oil market.

And there is also growing demand for crude oil in China that keeps oil prices bubbling. China's crude oil imports for the first five months of 2006 were up 17.9% at 12.4 million tons, importing more than 40% of its crude needs. China has just completed oil storage tanks in Zhejiang, Shandong and Liaoning, with capacity to hold up to 88 million barrels, and is planning another 200 million barrels of storage, with $941 billion of FX reserves to fund the crude oil build-up.

Crude Oil and the Middle East Powder-keg

Bernanke is playing a dangerous poker hand by gambling on steady oil prices. Crude oil has entered into un-chartered territory, with prices climbing above psychological barriers, such as $50, $60, and $70 per barrel, then establishing these levels as a base of support, before mounting rallies into higher ground. Markets don't trade in a straight line, they usually move up and down within a trend. Crude oil has been marching higher in an orderly fashion since the US conquest of Iraq, fueled by a razor thin difference between global supply and demand.

Iran is OPEC's second largest oil producer, and exports about 2.4 million barrels per day. Iranian leaders know how to rattle the nerves of crude oil traders, by threatening to shut down the Strait of Hormuz, and Iran's president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has frequently called for the destruction of Israel. In the latest flare-up of violence in the Middle East, Hezbollah and Hamas are doing the fighting against Israel, but Damascus and Tehran are pulling their strings.

The major wildcard in the Middle East depends on whether Tehran decides to take a chance and authorizes Hezbollah to launch long-range missiles with more powerful warheads at major Israeli cities. It is difficult to assess what the Iranian leadership will decide next in its war to "wipe Israel off the map." But if Hizbollah strikes Jerusalem or Tel-Aviv, it could spark a wider war between Israel and Syria, and Iran has vowed to join the battle, if Syria is attacked.

In a rare display of global market inter-action, crude oil and global stock markets took their cue from Israeli traders on July 16th, and reacted to the stunning "reversal bottom" for the Tel-Aviv-25 stock index on July 16th, which rallied 8% above its low of the day to close sharply higher at the 772-level. The reversal bottom in the TA-25 and the Israeli shekel's rebound against the US dollar, are ruling out a wider Mid-East war beyond Lebanon.

That knocked $5 per barrel off the Iranian "War Premium" for crude oil last week that has been built into world prices this year. Israeli commandos and tank units are expect to carve out a 20-mile buffer zone in southern Lebanon up to the Litani River, and keep control of the area until an international force of 10,000 to 20,000 soldiers can be deployed to take it over.

However, the Hezbollah representative in Tehran struck a defiant tone on July 24th, "We are going to make Israel un-safe for Israelis. There will be no place they are safe," said Hossein Safiadeen. "You will see a new Middle East in the way of Hezbollah and Islam, not in the way of Rice and Israel. This war will be remembered as the beginning of the end for Israel," Safiadeen warned.

Neither Israel Defense Force incursions in south Lebanon nor a UN sponsored cease-fire initiative would stop Hezbollah from firing rockets into northern Israel, the Hizbollah guerrilla leader, Sheikh Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah, declared on July 24th. "Any Israeli incursion will not have political results, most importantly to stop the bombardment of Zionist settlements, and I assure you that this will goal will not be achieved," he declared.

Sneak Preview of future battle with Iran?

Looking at the bigger picture, Hizbollah's attacks on northern Israel might just be a sneak preview of the damage that Tehran can inflict on Israel and the global stock markets, if the United States decides to push tough economic sanctions against Iran. Despite being the world's fourth biggest crude exporter, Iran is heavily dependent on gasoline imports because of its lack of refining capacity, and buys 440,000 bpd of gasoline from abroad, or 40% of its daily consumption.

Tehran could prove highly vulnerable to international sanctions on its gasoline imports. Iran's gasoline imports are supplied by Swiss-based trader Vitol and India's Reliance. Washington could go further with a naval blockade on Iran, halting its $54 billion per year of oil exports, or 90% of the Ayatollah's income. The US has defended Israel's air and sea blockade of Lebanon, to block the delivery of ammunition to Hizbollah, but also to gauge the local Lebanese reactions and attitudes for removing Hizbollah's weapons from their midst.

The Saudi royal family is also criticizing Hizbollah's actions, not out of love for the Jewish state, but out of fear that Hizbollah's rocket attacks are the opening salvo in Iran's war to "wipe Israel off the map." Saudi Arabia's All-share index has already tumbled by 50% since reaching an all-time high in February, losing $400 billion of market value, amid fears of a US-Iranian confrontation in the Persian Gulf.

Saudi Arabia's King Abdullah said on July 25th, that Israel's military offensives on Lebanon and the Palestinians could ignite a wider war in the region. "If the peace option fails because of Israeli arrogance, there will be no other option but war. No one can predict what will happen if things get out of control. Arab patience with Israel cannot last forever," said Abdullah, seeking a quick fix for the Shiite uprising.

Would the US initiate a unilateral blockade of Iranian oil exports, recognizing that China and Russia would never agree to UN sanctions against Iran? The loss of Iran's 2.4 million bpd of oil exports could be mostly made up by Saudi Arabia's 2 million bpd of spare capacity. In addition, member states of the OECD have oil reserves of about 4 billion barrels, enough to cover the Iranian shortfall for several years. And without its $54 billion of annual oil sales, Iran's economy could collapse, leading to massive unemployment, and a toppling the Ayatollah's regime.

Under this scenario, the world might have to live with $80 per barrel for crude oil. But Tehran won't take an oil embargo lightly, and would try to disrupt the flow of oil through the Strait of Hormuz, or 17 million barrels per day, to drive world oil prices to $100 per barrel or higher. Without credible economic sanctions against Iran though, the alternative is a military strike against its nuclear facilities, or a nuclear armed Iran. There just are no good alternatives, which is why crude oil is commanding a $10 to $15 per barrel "war premium."

The last time the crude oil market commanded a $10 to $15 per barrel "War Premium" was in November 2002 thru March 2003, as the drum beat of war with Saddam Hussein's regime grew louder. Yet at the moment US president George Bush presented Saddam with an ultimatum of war or exile on March 19th, the price of crude oil peaked, and began to collapse by 25% within a few days, even before the first bombs landed in Baghdad. Oil traders had correctly calculated that the war would end quickly, and without any damage to Iraq's oil installations.

There is always a risk that the current $10 to $15 per barrel "War Premium" built into oil prices, due to fears of an eventual military confrontation with Iran, could evaporate overnight, if Iran's Ayatollah flinches at the eleventh hour, and agrees to the UN incentive plan for abandoning the enrichment of uranium. But Iran is not Iraq, and the game of brinksmanship between the US and Iran, probably won't be settled until after the US Congressional elections in early November.

To read our analysis, forecasts, and inter-market technical charts for the CRB index, global interest rates, major global stock markets, and their underlying US-listed ETF's, foreign exchange rates, gold, copper, crude oil and other commodity markets, Subscribe to the Global Money Trends magazine. Please click on the hyperlink below to place an order now. http://www.sirchartsalot.com/newsletters.php

This article may be re-printed with links to www.sirchartsalot.com.