• 287 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 287 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 289 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 689 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 693 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 695 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 699 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 699 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 700 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 701 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 702 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 706 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 706 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 707 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 709 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 709 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 713 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 714 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 714 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 716 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Greg Ip Illustrates Why the Fed Should First, Do No Harm

In the June 4th edition of The Wall Street Journal, Greg Ip has written a piece explaining why the National Income and Product Account data, the data from which GDP estimates are derived, can be confusing and erroneous for various reasons (see "Options Hinder Efforts to Gauge Economic Growth,"). With a considerable lag, the errors and omissions get corrected. In effect, Ip is illustrating that the Fed and we mortals do not really know the current true state of the economy at any given point in time. Well, if the Fed does not know where the economy is in real time, how does it know the correct policy dial settings in real time to get the economy where it wants it? This is one reason why I and many before me, such as the late Professor Milton Friedman, have argued that the Fed should not attempt to fine tune the behavior of the economy through active and discretionary policy adjustments. Rather, the Fed should follow a rule. Probably the best rule would be to re-adopt the gold standard. But this is unlikely to occur in the lifetime of myself or anyone reading this rant. So, as a second-best (maybe twentieth best) proposal, I recommend that the Fed increase its balance sheet, essentially the reserves it creates for the banking system plus the currency held by the non-bank public, at a rate equal to the growth in the U.S. population. (For a fuller discussion of this rule, see my commentaries October 17, 2003 'Greenspan's Uncertainty Principle: Premise Accepted, Conclusion Rejected' and May 6, 2006 'Federal Reserve and Inflation Targeting - First Do No Harm') If the Fed adopted this rule, there would likely be no cumulative price increases of goods, services and assets, which presumably the Fed would be pleased with. We would experience business cycles, but they would be the result of "natural" real-side events, not Fed-induced monetary events.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment