• 207 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 211 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 213 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 216 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 217 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 218 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 219 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 220 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 224 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 224 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 225 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 227 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 227 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 231 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 231 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 232 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 234 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  • 234 days Europe’s Economy Is On The Brink As Putin’s War Escalates
  • 237 days What’s Causing Inflation In The United States?
  • 238 days Intel Joins Russian Exodus as Chip Shortage Digs In
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

A Connection Between the CI-NCI Ratio and the Coppock Curve?

The Monthly DJIA Coppock Curve has dropped below -125 into what I call "deep territory" 13 times since 1926, with the 13th occurrence coming on 10/31/02. This latest occurrence has not yet resolved itself, but the 12 earlier drops were all necessarily followed sooner or later by a deep or very deep Coppock buy signal. I define a deep signal as a turn up of at least 10 points from -125 or lower, while a very deep signal is a turn up of at least 10 points from -250 or lower.

Interestingly, 10 of those 12 earlier Coppock drops were associated with at least one instance of Peter Eliades' CI-NCI Ratio dipping to 0.9400 less than a year before the eventual deep or very deep Coppock buy signal. Only in 1941 and 1978 did that not happen. In the 10 cases where it did happen, the date the Ratio last reached 0.9400 to the downside preceded a deep or very deep Coppock buy signal by 15 trading days (8/31/32 very deep signal), 44 trading days (7/30/38 very deep signal), 142 trading days (9/30/42 deep signal), 171 trading days (8/29/47 deep signal), 91 trading days (1/31/63 deep signal), 179 trading days (4/28/67 deep signal), 105 trading days (8/31/70 deep signal), 159 trading days (1/31/75 very deep signal), 147 trading days (9/30/82 deep signal), and 228 trading days (10/31/88 deep signal).

The Monthly DJIA Coppock Curve is now in deep territory. A deep or very deep buy signal may yet arrive without the CI-NCI Ratio dipping to 0.9400, as in 1941 and 1978; or, more likely, the Ratio (which is now above 1.02) may dip to 0.9400 one or more times prior to the next deep or very deep buy signal, in which case that next buy signal should (based on precedent alone) lag 15 to 228 trading days behind the date the Ratio last reaches 0.9400 to the downside.

The weakness of this indicator is that if such a dip in the Ratio occurs we won't know at the time whether or not it's the last one; and if a second dip occurs we still won't know. Fortunately there are usually only one or two dips per scenario. However, in 1962 there were several dips within a few months, while in 1973-75 and 1929-32 there were several dips spread over multiple years.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment