• 555 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 555 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 557 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 957 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 962 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 964 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 967 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 967 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 968 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 970 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 970 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 974 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 974 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 975 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 977 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 978 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 981 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 982 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 982 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 984 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Post Coppock Curve Buy Signal Patterns

As shown in my June 6 communication, the 8 deep and very deep Monthly DJIA Coppock Curve buy signals which occurred between 12/1/61 and 5/30/03 comprise 4 distinct pairs with respect to trading day time path patterns generated by plotting the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio against the inverted Six by Ten TRIN.

The 8 time spans charted are the trading days from the Six by Ten CI-NCI Ratio's (last) dip to 0.9500 until the date of each buy signal; or, when there is no such dip, the 600 trading day time window prior to each buy signal.

The main point in that communication is that the 5/30/03 buy signal shares a time path pattern with the 4/28/78 buy signal. The 4/28/78 signal having been relatively unsuccessful, the implication is that the 5/30/03 may also be relatively unsuccessful.

Now consider the first 250 trading days AFTER each of those 8 signals (except in the case of 5/30/03 which happened only 20 trading days ago.)

So far, these 8 post signal time paths also pair off into 4 patterns, although in the case of 5/30/03 it's far too early to judge.

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment