• 525 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 526 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 527 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 927 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 932 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 934 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 937 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 937 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 938 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 940 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 940 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 944 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 944 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 945 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 947 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 948 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 951 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 952 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 952 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 954 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Higher Volatility

Yesterday, we discussed why the NYA Index (New York Stock Exchange) is an important index to watch ... because most of all the program trading occurs on it, and the large Institutional trades are found here.

We mentioned that, two of NYA things we watched was its Up Volume and Down Volume and mentioned that, together they were telling a story. We further noted only two comments in red: "Note that the peak level (of NYA UP Volume) was achieved 8 days ago, and the peaks have had lower tops since then." And ... we said, "If this condition persists (a high number of days with Down Volume above 10 million), that, we would see higher volatility in the days ahead."

Yesterday showed us that higher volatility as the indexes moved up until 1 PM and then swooned the rest of the day. As a result, the VIX (Volatility Index) rose to a level that was higher than the previous 12 days of closing values and broke a resistance line to the upside. (See today's third chart below.)

We will take another look at the NYA's UpVolume and DownVolume charts this morning, and rather than re-explain what we said and why, we will point you to yesterday's update if you haven't read it at this link: Volumes.

Let's now look at the Up/Down NYA Volume for yesterday, and then how the VIX Volatility reacted.

In this first chart, you can see data for Up Volume during the past 30 days. Each rising bar of data represents one day on a 5 minute tick basis. We can see that the NYA's Up Volume went under stress yesterday as it rose up to 16 million, and then erratically went up and down the rest of the day. It finally closed at 16 million which is a good sign because there was still plenty of buying in spite of all the selling. A negative that stands out, is the fact that the Up Volume is still making lower tops from its peak 9 days ago.

This chart shows the NYA's Down Volume for the same period of time.

Not surprisingly, we saw the NYA's Down Volume shoot up to a 30 day peak of 22 million giving us a net negative volume of 6 million for the day.

Next, we will look at how that affected the Volatility index ...

This is the VIX Index. Note how, the high amount of Down Volume days that we discussed yesterday, did indeed give us the rise in volatility that we expected.

Looking at the VIX chart below, you can see that the VIX rose high enough to take out the lows of the previous 12 days. In addition to that, the VIX broke its resistance line to the upside.

The magic of Bernanke's interest cut rate is now starting to wear off, and he will need to give us another cut if the earning's reports don't start coming in a little stronger than they have been. Most corporate CEOs are expecting weaker economic conditions 6 months from now, but on the positive side, they said that they saw no problems in raising their prices as an offset. That would be good for corporate profits, but not very good relative to the inflationary affect.

 

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment