• 399 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 399 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 401 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 801 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 806 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 808 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 811 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 811 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 812 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 814 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 814 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 818 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 818 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 819 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 821 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 822 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 825 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 826 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 826 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 828 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Another Retail Giant Bites The Dust

Forever 21 filed for Chapter…

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

Is The Bull Market On Its Last Legs?

This aging bull market may…

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

More freeports open around the…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

The Dow Theory Update

In the previous November posting here I explained that in accordance to Dow's theory we had an important non-confirmation at play, which served as a warning that something was wrong. I also explained that we were then in what is known as a Sell Spot in anticipation of a Primary Trend change. On November 21, 2007 this Primary Trend change occurred. As a result, the "Stock Market Barometer," as it was described by William Peter Hamilton back in the 1920's, is telling us that conditions are now stormy. This Primary Bear market will remain in force until negated by another confirmed bullish indication in accordance with Dow theory.

In the previous November posting I showed you the following quote from Robert Rhea:

"Under Dow's theory the primary trend, once authoritatively established as bullish, is considered to be continuing in force until negated by a confirmed bearish indication such as would be the case when, after a reaction of full secondary proportions in a bull market, a rally fails to lift both averages to new high ground, and a later decline carries both averages below the preceding secondary low."

Now that the Primary Trend change has occurred, I want to walk you through this quote and in doing so please refer to the chart below.

The last joint high confirming the Primary uptrend occurred on July 19th. The decline into the August lows were a "reaction of full secondary proportions in a bull market" and I told all of my subscribers that this was the case at the time the decline began. Anyway, from the August Secondary Low Points, the rally that followed failed "to lift both averages to new high ground." Thus, a non-confirmation was born. But, given that the Primary Trend had been authoritatively established and since the averages were still above the previous Secondary Low Points, this non-confirmation only served as a warning. Once the Transports broke down below their August low, the warning became even louder. But still, the existing Primary Bull market remained intact. It was then when the "later decline carried both averages below the preceding secondary low" that the Primary Trend change occurred.

I said in an interview on my website last week to look for this Dow theory signal to be questioned and sure enough that is already occurring. In one such example I received an e-mail stating that there is an error with Dow theorists saying that a primary sell signal was triggered when the Industrials moved below the August 16th closing low because the intraday low was not violated. I have also seen additional e-mails stating that because the August intra-day low on the Industrials has not been violated, that we also have a Dow theory downside non-confirmation in place. In yet another e-mail it was suggested that because the August 16th low was not violated by more that 1% that no signal was given. While another e-mail suggested that new lows had to be made on the exact same day.

In fairness, I can see why such misunderstandings can occur. But, none of these notions are correct from a pure Dow theory perspective. Now, you don't have to believe myself or Richard Russell in regard to this matter. Rather, we can turn to the original writings, which do reveal the facts. Charles H. Dow never actually wrote a book, but in his writings in the Wall Street Journal he clearly spoke in terms of closing price. If I turn to the works of Robert Rhea, who was the leading Dow theorist during the 1920's and 30's, we find that he in fact states "In studies of the application of Dow's theory to the price fluctuations of the Dow Jones Industrial and Railroad averages, only the closing prices are considered." So, in accordance with pure Dow theory it is the close that counts and as a result the requirements have been made to fulfill a Dow theory Primary Trend change and since it's the close that counts, there would not be a downside non-confirmation now forming.

In regard to the Dow theory requiring a 1% close below a previous level to trigger a Primary Trend change, that too is not a part of traditional Dow theory. Rhea explains that William Peter Hamilton would "quote various prices, correct to two decimals, then refer to the fact that one average had penetrated its earlier price by perhaps two or three cents." Rhea also wrote on this topic stating " Some students of the averages believe that under Dow's theory the piercing of a previous high or low point is inconclusive until both averages penetrate those prices by 1.01 points." Rhea goes on to state that both Dow and Hamilton considered "any penetration confirmed by both constitutes a valid penetration." Thus, it is clear from these writings that there is no threshold for price penetration of a given price level in order to be valid.

In regard to price penetration on the same day Rhea wrote "It is by no means necessary, as experience shows, that the low or high point of primary movement should be made in both averages on the same day."

The next question in regard to Dow theory is how long and how far down will this Bearish Primary Trend take the market. In accordance with Dow theory, the extent nor the duration of the Primary Trend once established is known. All I can tell you from a Dow theory perspective about this is that we are now operating within the context of a Primary Bear market, which will remain intact until it is reversed.

I have begun doing free Friday market commentary that is available at www.cyclesman.com/Articles.htm so please begin joining me there. In the December issue of Cycles News & Views I will be reviewing a statistical analysis of all Primary Bear markets going back to 1896 in an effort to answer the question of how far this decline could potentially go. I also have a very detailed slide show presentation on cycle quantifications, which gives a statistical analysis surrounding the overdone 4-year cycle and what is expected to follow. A subscription includes access to the monthly issues of Cycles News & Views, which included Dow theory, a very detailed statistical based analysis covering not only the stock market, but the dollar, bonds, gold, silver, oil and gasoline along with short-term updates 3 times a week.


Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment