• 525 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 526 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 527 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 927 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 932 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 934 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 937 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 937 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 938 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 940 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 940 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 944 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 944 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 945 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 947 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 948 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 951 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 952 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 952 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 954 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

It's All About Risk Tolerance

Here is an extract from commentary posted at www.speculative-investor.com on 18th September 2003:

The performance of the NASDAQ100 Index (NDX) relative to the performance of the Dow Industrials Index is a measure of the willingness of market participants to take on risk. This is because the stocks that populate the NDX are generally considered to have higher growth and higher risk profiles than the stocks that populate the Dow, so during those periods when investors are becoming less risk averse (when they are becoming more concerned about capturing potential upside than avoiding potential downside) the NDX trends higher relative to the Dow. Conversely, when investors start to become more concerned about downside risk than upside potential the NDX begins to under-perform the Dow.

The reason it is important to understand whether investors are becoming more or less risk averse is that changes in the level of risk aversion often trump valuation over the short and even the medium term. For example, as long as investors are prepared to take on more risk then an extremely over-valued market can continue to move higher. Similarly, an extremely under-valued market can continue to move lower as long as the level of fear continues to increase. Value always wins out in the end, but sometimes only after a large and lengthy divergence.

Further to the above, weve focused on the NDX/Dow ratio because it provides a simple and effective way to monitor the general level of risk aversion in the market. We expect a major decline to get underway at some point over the next few months and for the stock indices to drop below their October-2002 lows during 2004. However, although there is enormous valuation risk in the market there isn't much chance of such a decline commencing while the NDX/Dow ratio is still trending higher.

The most likely outcome is that the NDX/Dow ratio will turn lower prior to the final peak in the Dow Industrials Index. Given that the ratio made a new high earlier this week (see chart below) a major decline is probably NOT about to commence. As discussed in previous commentaries, this has important (bullish) implications for gold stocks.

The NDX/Dow ratio isn't the only indicator of the general level of risk aversion in the markets. Another indicator worth monitoring is the behaviour of credit spreads (credit spreads are the differences between the yields on different debt securities). For example, when credit spreads are contracting it means that yields on higher-risk debt securities are falling relative to the yields on lower-risk debt securities. And this, in turn, indicates that investors are becoming less risk averse. In such an environment corporate debt will tend to perform better than US Treasury debt, junk bonds will generally out-perform AAA-rated corporate bonds, and the debt of emerging-market countries will fall into favour.

Credit spreads have generally trended lower over the past 12 months and have thus behaved consistently with the NDX/Dow ratio. Furthermore, if the following extract from Doug Noland's latest Credit Bubble Bulletin at www.prudentbear.com is anything to go by then there is not yet any sign of the current trend letting up.

'September 11 - Dow Jones (Sonja Ryst): 'As hungry buyers continue bidding up the prices on government and corporate debt from emerging markets, three big-name issuers came to market on Thursday, kicking off what's expected to be a busy few weeks of issuance...'The markets are poised to have issuance from everywhere in the next couple weeks,' said Mike Conelius, a portfolio manager at T. Rowe Price...J.P. Morgan said in a recent report that $11 billion in emerging market debt issuance remains to be completed this year and that $32 billion had been placed so far... Debtors haven't been able to raise international bond funding at such low cost in years. The J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Plus, or EMBI+, is trading at around 475 basis points over comparable U.S. Treasurys. The last time the EMBI+ went below 480 basis points was on May 5, 1998.'(Emphasis added)

It is worth noting, though, that once the trend does change things will probably unravel very quickly. This, in turn, makes the current market environment very challenging for anyone who understands the risks. Those who don't understand the risks can, of course, just remain calmly 'long' until the whole thing comes crashing down around them.

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment