• 735 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 735 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 737 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 1,137 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 1,142 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 1,144 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 1,147 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 1,147 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 1,148 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 1,150 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 1,150 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 1,154 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 1,154 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 1,155 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 1,157 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 1,158 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 1,161 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 1,162 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 1,162 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 1,164 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Economy

The Fed’s $3 Trillion Headache

The Fed’s $3 Trillion Headache

On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve unveiled plans to begin selling its corporate debt in the Secondary Market Corporate Credit Facility ("SMCCF"), an emergency lending facility that helped support credit markets during the pandemic crisis.

The move completes the central bank’s move away from market support programs it launched last year as part of a Covid-19 relief program. Five of those emergency facilities expired in late 2020.

The Fed says that as corporate bond spreads widen, the SMCCF portfolio sales will occur gradually and orderly and will aim to minimize the potential for any adverse impact on the bond markets including daily liquidity and trading conditions for ETFs and corporate bonds.

Corporate bonds appear to have taken the news in stride, with the largest credit ETF, iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (NYSEARCA:LQD) slightly down. The U.S. weekly fund flows insight report by Refinitiv Lipper ending June 2nd, 2021, shows that LQD saw outflows of $605 million during the week. LQD has $40.4B in assets under management (AUM).

Which is perhaps to be expected considering that the Fed’s move to unwind its corporate-bond portfolio is relatively minor compared to any future quantitative easing (QE) measures it might unveil in the future. As per the central bank’s latest report, the Fed owned $13.8 billion in bonds and bond ETFs, a minuscule percentage of the overall corporate bond market of more than $10 trillion, according to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association.

Fed’s holdings make up between 0.5% and 7.2% of each fund’s market capitalization.

Surprise move

Wall Street has taken divergent views of the Fed’s latest mini-QE.

Bank of America strategists have raised concerns about the move, pointing at the Fed’s checkered track record when it comes to QE programs.

“Clearly the Fed has little in terms of a successful track record in selling assets and also by far most of the time merely adjusts policy to market expectations. This is why the Fed’s announcement today--which was 100% surprising--to begin gradually selling their portfolio of corporate debt acquired during the liquidity crisis last year is very negative for risk assets. Clearly the Fed feels sufficiently emboldened by the scarcity of credit assets in the front end of the curve and high valuations to be comfortable testing markets in this way,” the bank has said.

Citigroup ETF strategists have adopted a more positive stance, labeling the Fed’s “timing a bit surprising, but not unreasonable.” Citigroup had originally estimated that it would take years to “fully unwind” the emergency portfolio; however, the bank says that “a more speedy unwind of ETFs does help ensure a profit is returned to the Treasury, which is definitely a bonus from the facility.’’

Citigroup does note that “Messaging and concerns of further monetary policy tightening could make investors somewhat nervous, hence some modest softness in credit ETFs today.”

Although the Fed has in the past been clear that its QE policy will only change when the data on unemployment and inflation changes, pressure from this policy is gradually building in the banking sector, as well as the treasury and repo markets. Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan,  Citi and Morgan Stanley have talked about the stress being put upon their institutions by the more than $3 trillion of bank reserves created by the Fed in 2020.

The Fed has continued buying bonds at a tepid pace of $120 billion a month with Fed chairman Jerome Powell maintaining it is still too early to even talk about tapering. Unfortunately, this wall of deposited liquidity means that the Wall Street banks must issue billions in bonds and preferred equity in a bid to try and stay within their supplementary leverage ratios (SLRs). 

The March 2021 expiration of the exemption on U.S. securities and deposits held at Fed banks in banks’ total leverage exposure has only made that exercise harder.

By Alex Kimani for Safehaven.com

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment