• 5 days Has Bitcoin Stopped Bleeding? Some Analysts Seem To Think So
  • 6 days Amazon ‘Competitor’ Charged With Crypto Fraud Scheme
  • 7 days China’s Road To Tech Independence
  • 12 days 3 Major Bearish Catalysts For The U.S. Economy In 2022
  • 14 days VR Industry Boomed During Holiday Season
  • 14 days 3 Global eCommerce Brands Have Overtaken Amazon
  • 16 days Another Banner Year for Billionaires
  • 20 days Top 3 Predictions For Bitcoin In The New Year
  • 21 days China Moves To Tighten Rules For Companies Looking To List Abroad
  • 22 days Fake Reviews Go All The Way To The Top
  • 29 days Airlines Want The Government To Ditch Emergency Testing For Covid-19
  • 29 days The Service Robot Industry Is Booming
  • 34 days The 3 Biggest Market Risks In 2022
  • 37 days Fintech Valuations Have Grown Red-Hot
  • 40 days Business Opportunities In the New Metaverse
  • 41 days Cryptocurrency Markets Have Gone Amok, Again
  • 42 days Wall Street Speaks: No 10% Correction for Markets
  • 43 days Top 3 Stocks To Play The Santa Claus Rally
  • 44 days DIDI Delisting Is A Worrying Sign For Investors Holding Chinese Stocks
  • 49 days Stocks Tumble After Moderna Chief Warns Existing Vaccines Could Be Less Effectiv
Space Is About To Get Its First Hotel

Space Is About To Get Its First Hotel

By 2027, we’ll have our…

US Retail Has A Major Supply Chain Problem

US Retail Has A Major Supply Chain Problem

Before the pandemic, goods typically…

Michael Scott

Michael Scott

Writer, Safehaven.com

Michael Scott majored in International Business at San Francisco State University and University of Economics, Prague. He is now working as a news editor for…

Contact Author

  1. Home
  2. News
  3. Breaking News

Silicon Valley Investor Calls Start-Up Economy A Ponzi Scheme

Silicon Valley

Silicon Valley’s Chamath Palihapitiya, the tech investor behind the Social Capital venture firm, is telling clients that the start-up economy is has turned into a sophisticated—and dangerous—Ponzi scheme and the high-stakes losers are employees and limited partners.

In a letter from Social Capital, Palihapitiya notes that “over the past decade, a subtle and sophisticated game has emerged between VCs, LPs, founders, and employees”, and someone has to foot the bill for it as VCs are “smart enough to transfer the risk”.

He compares it to the American healthcare industry, which he says is so expensive because “insurers, who play a key middleman role in setting prices for medical care, have a fantastic two-sided business model”.

“High prices, which out to be a cost of doing business for them, are actually a key revenue driver,” Palihapitiya says.

That’s because high prices make it possible for them to charge high premiums and milk the cow extensively. That keeps the cost of medicine on the steady increase, along with insurance profits. Who’s left holding the bag? Patients and payers.

This is exactly how VCs are operating in the start-up world, he says. They “habitually invest in on another’s companies during later rounds, bidding up rounds to valuations that allow for generous markups on their funds’ performance”. Then, like health insurance companies, that makes it easier for them to generate even larger funds, and nice management fees.

“So even if paying or marking up sky-high valuations will make it less likely that a fund manager will ever see their share of earned profit, it makes it ?more? likely they’ll get to raise larger funds - and earn enormous management fees. There’s some deep misalignment here...,” he wrote.

In other words, just like in the healthcare industry, today’s venture world doesn’t register marked-up valuations as a cost for VCs—rather, they are a key revenue driver and a wide open door to new funds and fees. That also means higher operating costs for start-ups across the board. Related: Analysts See Upside In Energy Stocks

Footing the bill are employees and early-stage limited partners, or future limited partners—the ones who get stuck paying for the hefty management fees.

Here’s where it becomes with Palihapitiya calls a Ponzi “balloon”, with VCs “marking up Fund IV in order to raise money for more management fees out of Fund V, and so on […]”. The VCs are profiting hugely from the management fees long before a start-up is even successful.

And then startup employees are left holding the bag, too, in a much more dramatic way. This is because of the Silicon Valley trend to pay employees in stock options and restricted stock units.

Palihapitiya says it’s time for a change, and a return to the “roots” of venture investing.

“The real expense in a startup shouldn’t be their bill from Big Tech but, rather, the cost of real innovation and R&D,” he writes.

He also thinks it’s time to do away with the “multilevel marketing scheme that the VC-LP-user growth game has become”.

More to the point, he says, it’s time to let the air out of this “bizarre Ponzi balloon”.

By Michael Scott for Safehaven.com

More Top Reads From Safehaven.com:

Back to homepage

Leave a comment
  • David Logan on November 07 2018 said:
    Couldn't agree more. We are currently working to increase transparency through the use of https://Umergence.com a business development platform connecting startups with 3 types of capital. Intellectual Capital, Networking Capital and Financial Capital.

Leave a comment