QVM Market Note: SP500 Failed To Pass the 38% Fibonacci Retracement Level

By: Richard Shaw | Thu, Aug 18, 2011
Print Email

This is a government policy and government whispers driven market, as well as one where GDP growth rate projections are being reduced. Earnings projections must logically follow.

Technically, the S&P 500 has failed to go above the 38% Fibonacci retracement level from last low to the recent high. While this may sound or be mystical, it is nonetheless one of the indicators that a significant number of technical analysts follow, therefore it becomes real and meaningful. A test of the 1100 low is now a high probability.

S&P 500 Large Cap Index

Accounts we manage which have chosen to tactically allocate between Owning, Loaning and Reserving, currently have 25% or less in stocks (and 5% to 10+% of that is in a gold ETF). Better buying opportunities may be ahead. Buying early rallies in this volatile market is not a good idea, unless taking a strong stand on a long term position regardless of short-term price action.

Conservative investors with a greater emphasis on capital preservation than reaching for gain, would probably refrain from re-entering the SP500 until it goes back above its 200-day average and is more than 50% or 60% of the way back to its July high. Of course, if it craters from here, all new price points would apply.

Upon re-entry, all but aggressive investors, should probably select large-cap, high quality, above average yield companies with strong business franchises, and demonstrated history of dividend payments and dividend increases. Getting paid cash while holding stocks is important, and grows more important as the portfolio becomes part of the cash flow source to support lifestyle or operations.


While saying wait for a significant rally to buy, I have personally sold options (cash premium in to me now) to purchase SP500 shares in limited quantities if the index reaches 1000 and 970 (currently 1141). Those are levels where taking incremental risk might make sense to me personally, however, if it falls like a rock through those levels to 2008 levels, I will regret my decision to sell the options. Since risk control is key at all times, my exposure is limited in proportion to my assets. Such action is both aggressive and not available in IRA or 401-k accounts, nor in accounts that are not authorized for both margin and options level 3. [level 0 = writing covered calls; level 1 = buying long options; level 2 = options spreads; level 3 is "naked" option writing]. I would not personally purchase the index at this time and would personally wait for the 50% to 60% retracement to go long at this general level in this macro environment.



Richard Shaw

Author: Richard Shaw

Richard Shaw

Richard Shaw

Disclaimer: Opinions expressed in this material and our disclosed positions are as of July 5, 2010. Our opinions and positions may change as subsequent conditions vary. We are a fee-only investment advisor, and are compensated only by our clients. We do not sell securities, and do not receive any form of revenue or incentive from any source other than directly from clients. We are not affiliated with any securities dealer, any fund, any fund sponsor or any company issuer of any security. All of our published material is for informational purposes only, and is not personal investment advice to any specific person for any particular purpose. We utilize information sources that we believe to be reliable, but do not warrant the accuracy of those sources or our analysis. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance, and there is no guarantee that any forecast will come to pass. Do not rely solely on this material when making an investment decision. Other factors may be important too. Investment involves risks of loss of capital. Consider seeking professional advice before implementing your portfolio ideas.

IMPORTANT NOTE: We are a Registered Investment Advisor. We do not sell investments or control client assets. We are professional advisors compensated on an hourly basis or flat fee basis for portfolio management or for our coaching advice. Clients for personal investment advice receive recommendations and guidance tailored to their specific needs. Newsletters and research publications, are not personal investment advice, are generic in nature and should not be interpreted as specific advice for any specific person or situation. In our research, we utilize information sources that we believe are reliable, but do not warrant the accuracy of those sources or our analysis. Research, data and opinions expressed on this site are for information purposes only, are general in character and are not advice specific to any individual investor.

Copyright 2008-2017 by QVM Group LLC All rights reserved.

All Images, XHTML Renderings, and Source Code Copyright © Safehaven.com