• 306 days Will The ECB Continue To Hike Rates?
  • 306 days Forbes: Aramco Remains Largest Company In The Middle East
  • 308 days Caltech Scientists Succesfully Beam Back Solar Power From Space
  • 707 days Could Crypto Overtake Traditional Investment?
  • 712 days Americans Still Quitting Jobs At Record Pace
  • 714 days FinTech Startups Tapping VC Money for ‘Immigrant Banking’
  • 717 days Is The Dollar Too Strong?
  • 718 days Big Tech Disappoints Investors on Earnings Calls
  • 718 days Fear And Celebration On Twitter as Musk Takes The Reins
  • 720 days China Is Quietly Trying To Distance Itself From Russia
  • 720 days Tech and Internet Giants’ Earnings In Focus After Netflix’s Stinker
  • 724 days Crypto Investors Won Big In 2021
  • 725 days The ‘Metaverse’ Economy Could be Worth $13 Trillion By 2030
  • 725 days Food Prices Are Skyrocketing As Putin’s War Persists
  • 728 days Pentagon Resignations Illustrate Our ‘Commercial’ Defense Dilemma
  • 728 days US Banks Shrug off Nearly $15 Billion In Russian Write-Offs
  • 731 days Cannabis Stocks in Holding Pattern Despite Positive Momentum
  • 732 days Is Musk A Bastion Of Free Speech Or Will His Absolutist Stance Backfire?
  • 732 days Two ETFs That Could Hedge Against Extreme Market Volatility
  • 734 days Are NFTs About To Take Over Gaming?
Strong U.S. Dollar Weighs On Blue Chip Earnings

Strong U.S. Dollar Weighs On Blue Chip Earnings

Earnings season is well underway,…

The Problem With Modern Monetary Theory

The Problem With Modern Monetary Theory

Modern monetary theory has been…

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

How The Ultra-Wealthy Are Using Art To Dodge Taxes

More freeports open around the…

  1. Home
  2. Markets
  3. Other

Bonds and the Dollar

Here is an extract from commentary posted at www.speculative-investor.com on 20th July 2003:

The bond-dollar relationship is one of the most important inter-market relationships 'on the go' at the moment and (we think) contains some important clues regarding what to expect from the financial markets over the next few months.

In our 30th June commentary we discussed the fact that the bond-dollar relationship has not been consistent over the past 25 years in that bonds and the dollar have trended in the same direction for extended periods and moved in opposite directions during other periods. As the following chart shows, though, since the beginning of 2002 there has been a strong inverse correlation between the Dollar Index and the US T-Bond price.

The inverse correlation illustrated in the above chart has occurred for a number of reasons, one of which is the behaviour of foreign (non-US) central banks in general and the Bank of Japan in particular. This is because the countries that rely heavily on exporting goods to the US do not want their currencies to appreciate against the dollar. Therefore, as the dollar weakens the central banks of these countries intervene in the currency market by purchasing dollars using their own currency (which they can create out of thin air). The dollars purchased as a result of these interventions are then invested in US Treasury or Agency debt in order to earn some interest income. In other words, in the current environment every drop in the US$ indirectly stimulates foreign central bank demand for US bonds. Correspondingly, when the dollar stabilises or starts to rise there is no need for currency-market intervention on the part of foreign central banks and one of the major components of the demand for US bonds is immediately removed.

As an aside, Richard Duncan described another important aspect of the currency market manipulation undertaken on a routine basis by central banks throughout the world in his recent article titled "Asia, its reserves and the coming dollar crisis" which can be read at http://www.financeasia.com/articles/E867AEB6-642E-11D7-81FA0090277E174B.cfm. In this article Mr Duncan explains how the massive US current account deficit continues to be the catalyst for spectacular credit-fueled booms and equally spectacular busts in the export-oriented economies of Asia. In a nutshell, US Dollars pour into the countries that run large trade surpluses with the US. The initial recipients of these dollars (the manufacturers of the goods that were shipped to the US) usually want to exchange most of their newly-acquired US currency for local currency, but doing so would cause the local currency's exchange rate to rise and would therefore reduce the country's international competitiveness. To prevent this from happening the central banks of the countries that run large trade surpluses with the US 'soak up' the excess dollars (they purchase the dollars using newly-created local currency). Therefore, an indirect result of the large US trade deficit is that the surplus nations tend to experience rapid money-supply growth, which, in turn, causes unsustainable booms.

Getting back to the above chart, notice how the March-June plunge in the dollar was accompanied by a surge in the T-Bond price but as soon as the dollar began to rebound, the bond price crashed. The question is: Will this inverse relationship continue?

We don't see any reason why it won't continue for at least a few more months. It is certainly likely that foreign central banks will continue to try to prevent the US$ from falling too far, too fast, so we expect that any significant decline in the US$ will lead to the Bank of Japan and other central banks making large purchases of US Government and Agency debt. Furthermore, such purchases will probably be sufficient to push the T-Bond price higher between now and the time when the US inflation problem is more widely recognised. It is also likely that foreign central banks would have a much smaller presence in the bond market if the dollar's rebound continued for a few more months. And, without the support of foreign central banks US bond prices would most likely fall under the weight of their own over-valuation.

The price action suggests that bonds have either already reached a short-term low or are very close to doing so. It wouldn't be a surprise if slightly lower levels were reached over the coming month, but we expect that the next tradable move in bonds (for those who trade the multi-month swings) will be to the upside. However, if the inverse relationship between bonds and the dollar is still in effect then this bond-market view only makes sense if the dollar is going to commence another multi-month decline at some point over the next few weeks. Interestingly, the market action towards the end of last week [the week ending on 18th July] provided us with some preliminary evidence that another dollar decline has begun. In other words, the pieces of the puzzle are starting to fit together rather nicely.

Back to homepage

Leave a comment

Leave a comment